[VOTE][RESULT] Accept Pig graduation as a Hadoop subproject

2008-10-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...The Pig [1] and Hadoop [2] communities have voted to graduate Pig as a > Hadoop subproject. > > According to [3| the Incubator PMC needs to accept this graduation. > > Please cast your votes - as the weekend is sta

Re: new tool "clutch" assist oversight of all podlings

2008-10-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:37 PM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...I developed a tool called "clutch". Below are some notes > from its generated web page Just ran clutch to process the Pig graduation changes, inconsistencies between [1] and [2] were detected correctly, everythin

Re: new tool "clutch" assist oversight of all podlings

2008-10-22 Thread David Crossley
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > > ...I developed a tool called "clutch". Below are some notes > > from its generated web page > > Just ran clutch to process the Pig graduation changes, inconsistencies > between [1] and [2] were detected correctly, everything looks good.

Re: new tool "clutch" assist oversight of all podlings

2008-10-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:31 AM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> ...Just ran clutch to process the Pig graduation changes, inconsistencies >> between [1] and [2] were detected correctly, everything looks good. > > There is something wrong there. Clutch sh

[IP CLEARANCE] Velocity-Tiles integration, need for someone to process the request

2008-10-22 Thread Antonio
Dear all, I am Antonio Petrelli, PMC member of the Apache Tiles project. We would like to process the IP Clearance for the Velocity-Tiles integration, whose ZIP file containing the code and the IP clearance template are in this JIRA issue: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/TILES-170 We need

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-86) Request SVN from INFRA

2008-10-22 Thread scott comer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-86?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641768#action_12641768 ] scott comer commented on INCUBATOR-86: -- hmmm. it appears someone is waiting on someo

Re: new tool "clutch" assist oversight of all podlings

2008-10-22 Thread David Crossley
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >> ...Just ran clutch to process the Pig graduation changes, inconsistencies > >> between [1] and [2] were detected correctly, everything looks good. > > > > There is something wrong there. Clutch should not > > fai

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept Pig graduation as a Hadoop subproject

2008-10-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...I will update the incubator website info accordingly, in the next few > days... Done, the following pages reflect pig's new status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html http://incubator.apache.org/cl

What's up with WSRP4J?

2008-10-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, According to clutch, WSRP4J has been incubating for 1876 days... Did not report at all this year AFAIK, and not much seems to be happening on the project lists [1] The code is in the portals svn space [3] with no disclaimer. About a year ago [2] Carsten mentioned a pending license issue tha

Re: [Vote] [Policy] clarify podling acceptance: INCUBATOR-93

2008-10-22 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: > See patch at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-93 > to clarify the acceptance phase of new podlings > because the process depends on who is Sponsor. > > The gist of it is: > - > In Incubation_Policy.xml ... > * Add sentence to distinguish between IPM

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-95) Release guidelines contain incorrect permissions, url for distributing release

2008-10-22 Thread Aidan Skinner (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12642012#action_12642012 ] Aidan Skinner commented on INCUBATOR-95: Bueller? You can really hork things if

[jira] Closed: (INCUBATOR-93) Incubation_Policy.html#Acceptance+By+Incubator needs clarification: process depends on who is Sponsor

2008-10-22 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-93?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Crossley closed INCUBATOR-93. --- Resolution: Fixed The Vote was a successful result. One person voted here, the others on ge

[jira] Closed: (INCUBATOR-95) Release guidelines contain incorrect permissions, url for distributing release

2008-10-22 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Crossley closed INCUBATOR-95. --- Resolution: Fixed I applied your patch, thanks. According to http://incubator.apache.org/

Re: new tool "clutch" assist oversight of all podlings

2008-10-22 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > > BTW I don't think there's a link to clutch.html on the incubator website. > > Yeah, i haven't yet figured out which section of the > left-hand menu to put it. > > I am inclined towards "Podling Guides" section just above > the "Graduation

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-91) Request User accounts from INFRA

2008-10-22 Thread Niclas Hedhman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12642054#action_12642054 ] Niclas Hedhman commented on INCUBATOR-91: - Requests sent to root. This typically

[jira] Resolved: (INCUBATOR-91) Request User accounts from INFRA

2008-10-22 Thread Niclas Hedhman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Niclas Hedhman resolved INCUBATOR-91. - Resolution: Fixed Marking this as Resolved. Close it when the Confirmations arrive from

[jira] Updated: (INCUBATOR-87) Submission of ICLAs for initial committers

2008-10-22 Thread Niclas Hedhman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Niclas Hedhman updated INCUBATOR-87: Description: All committers must file ICLAs with the ASF Secretary. By snail mail, fax o

[jira] Closed: (INCUBATOR-87) Submission of ICLAs for initial committers

2008-10-22 Thread Niclas Hedhman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Niclas Hedhman closed INCUBATOR-87. --- Resolution: Fixed All initial committers have their ICLAs on file. > Submission of ICLAs f

[jira] Created: (INCUBATOR-97) Submission of CCLAs for initial committers

2008-10-22 Thread Niclas Hedhman (JIRA)
Submission of CCLAs for initial committers -- Key: INCUBATOR-97 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-97 Project: Incubator Issue Type: Sub-task Reporter: Niclas Hedhman Th

Re: [jira] Created: (INCUBATOR-97) Submission of CCLAs for initial committers

2008-10-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
> The company that a committer work for must acknowledge that the employee(s) > in question are allowed to work on Apache projects. > > In this case, that is Cisco, and we have no CCLA at all on file from Cisco. This is incorrect (unless you are speaking of you). CCLA's are a convenience for th

Re: [jira] Created: (INCUBATOR-97) Submission of CCLAs for initial committers

2008-10-22 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The company that a committer work for must acknowledge that the employee(s) >> in question are allowed to work on Apache projects. >> >> In this case, that is Cisco, and we have no CCLA at all on file from Cisco. >

Re: [jira] Created: (INCUBATOR-97) Submission of CCLAs for initial committers

2008-10-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > Ook So, what you are saying is that we now asking the > committers to become legally affluent? No, only to become aware of the fact that what they do is owned by their employer, or that it is not. In most cases in CA US for example, what you do on "your time" in