On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The company that a committer work for must acknowledge that the employee(s) >> in question are allowed to work on Apache projects. >> >> In this case, that is Cisco, and we have no CCLA at all on file from Cisco. > > This is incorrect (unless you are speaking of you). > > CCLA's are a convenience for the benefit of ICLA signatories. It is not the > incubator's responsibility to validate that ICLA signers are legally able to > do so. Depending on their contractual relationship to their > employer/contractor > they may need this or they may not. > > Point ICLA signers at this document to reinforce the fact that they -might- > not > be able to sign the ICLA without it.
Ooooook.... So, what you are saying is that we now asking the committers to become legally affluent? My point; What happens to average committer candidate when the employer says "No, you don't need us to sign this..."? Cheers Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
