Re: Release votes (was: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release)

2006-06-05 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 6/3/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/2/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like the idea of automation. > > What would be even more helpful would be a default Apache project > setup, with a maven release target that builds a release in the right > format. > > If

Re: Release votes (was: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release)

2006-06-05 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 6/2/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (this is a rant and the beginnings of a proposal which has nothing to do in particular with James, ActiveMQ, or its release) There must be. All these little rules and policies and practices (written or unwritten) seem like they could be some

Re: Release votes (was: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release)

2006-06-03 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On 6/2/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I like the idea of automation. What would be even more helpful would be a default Apache project setup, with a maven release target that builds a release in the right format. If the project structure started out with LICENSE, NOTICE, JAR targ

Re: Release votes (was: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release)

2006-06-02 Thread Hiram Chirino
Agreed. Any tools that help incubating projects get off to the right start we be a good start. Even if it's just a check list that has all the things that have been found to be missing before in previous attempted releases would be a great idea. On 6/2/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: Release votes (was: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release)

2006-06-02 Thread Paul Fremantle
I like the idea of automation. What would be even more helpful would be a default Apache project setup, with a maven release target that builds a release in the right format. If the project structure started out with LICENSE, NOTICE, JAR targets that put those in META-INF, places to put auxiliar

Re: Release votes (was: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release)

2006-06-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jun 2, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Leo Simons wrote: (this is a rant and the beginnings of a proposal which has nothing to do in particular with James, ActiveMQ, or its release) On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:11:35PM +0100, James Strachan wrote: In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see

Release votes (was: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release)

2006-06-02 Thread Leo Simons
(this is a rant and the beginnings of a proposal which has nothing to do in particular with James, ActiveMQ, or its release) On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:11:35PM +0100, James Strachan wrote: > In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the > ActiveMQ community has voted on and ap