Ashish Srivastava wrote:
> Steven Noels wrote:
> Noel, I think that there has been some confusion.
Starting with the fact that you were responding to a message from Steven
Noels, so it should have been "Steven, I think ..." :-)
> The number and profile of committers will be decided by ASF.
Act
> Noel, I think that there has been some confusion.
Amongst which may be that you were replying to Steven NOELS, and I am NOEL
Bergman. :-)
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comm
A general comment:
Whether any developer are paid or not is really immaterial to
us; in fact, I would say, quite simply, that the ASF doesn't
care at all.
The ASF is focused on the efforts of *individual volunteer
committers*. *People* are granted committer (and membership)
status based on their in
Dear members,
Please find attached our thoughts.
>I find this rather confusing. One of the criteria for exiting
> incubation is a *diverse* set of committers - i.e. an appropriate
> proportion of Daffodil "for-pay" developers but also non-Daffodil
> folks. If your idea of the original number of c
On 18 Aug 2004, at 12:29, Ashish Srivastava wrote:
:0)Nice point. 20 developers will work part time (This figure
could be
10, 15, 20 or 30) beacuse, as you said, there would need to be a
critical
mass of initial contributors. If there are developers out there who
consider
Replicator an ex
On 18 Aug 2004, at 06:31, Simon Kitching wrote:
To members of the incubator PMC: now would be a good time to speak up
if
you disagree with anything I've said!
No way: you're doing perfectly fine. Thanks!
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Sourc
Re: Making Daffodil Replicator an Open Source : Suggestion
This sounds like a great tool! Offline synching for any JDBC compliant
database with triggers and procedures is good stuff.
Are the sources available anywhere right now?
The general steps to enter incubation are described i
This sounds like a great tool! Offline synching for any JDBC compliant
database with triggers and procedures is good stuff.
Are the sources available anywhere right now?
The general steps to enter incubation are described in the document:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.h
sage-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 4:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ashish Srivastava
Subject: RE: Making Daffodil Replicator an Open Source : Suggestion
Ashish Srivastava wrote:
> We are planning to make our Daffodil Replicator an open
Ashish Srivastava wrote:
> We are planning to make our Daffodil Replicator an open source project.
I have read the information at http://www.daffodildb.com/dbreplicator.php,
but it is unclear from "Replicator integrates impeccably with all Daffodil
database products as well as with selected third
On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 05:20, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Ashish Srivastava wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are a product based company named Daffodil Software Ltd, based in
> > India. We have developed many good products using JAVA out of which our
> > two premium product Daffodil DB (an RDBMS) and Daff
Ashish Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
We are a product based company named Daffodil Software Ltd, based in
India. We have developed many good products using JAVA out of which our
two premium product Daffodil DB (an RDBMS) and Daffodil Replicator
(database utility software) is largely accepted by world softw
J Aaron Farr wrote:
...
The existing Incubator documents are better than ever before but we still
regularly get questions like this.
Perhaps they don't even know about the Incubator.
Perhaps we need a small FAQ
http://www.apache.org/foundation/faq.html#synergy
or little
tutorial on how to go abo
> -Original Message-
> From: Ashish Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
...
>
> I visited at http://incubator.apache.org but unable to find the answer
> how to proceed in order to make our product open source. So I am mailing
> you. I also want to join apache as member.
In particular yo
14 matches
Mail list logo
