On 01.12.2012 16:00, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Make every vote a bugzilla issue, and use the existing script that mails
> an issue summary once a week?
That's certainly one thing I considered.
-- Brane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> I know; but it got everyone's attention, didn't it. :)
Lesson learned.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional com
Make every vote a bugzilla issue, and use the existing script that mails
an issue summary once a week?
Ross Gardler wrote on Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 14:55:05 +:
> That tool would be useful in more places than the incubator. Great idea.
> I'm looking forward to seeing it ;-)
>
> Sent from my tab
That tool would be useful in more places than the incubator. Great idea.
I'm looking forward to seeing it ;-)
Sent from my tablet
On Dec 1, 2012 2:51 PM, "Branko Čibej" wrote:
> On 01.12.2012 15:06, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >> It's quite
On 01.12.2012 15:06, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails
>> about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release
>> tarball from a podling.
> Reviewing a release when
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails
> about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release
> tarball from a podling.
Reviewing a release when you are not directly involved as a developer is
**
Sorry, seems it was Luciano I agreed with.
Sent from my tablet
On Dec 1, 2012 8:43 AM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
> I'm with Benson here. But we do need to acknowledge the problem identified
> (again) by Branko.
>
> This is a mentoring problem not an IPMC problem. The IPMC needs to solve
> it for exi
I'm with Benson here. But we do need to acknowledge the problem identified
(again) by Branko.
This is a mentoring problem not an IPMC problem. The IPMC needs to solve it
for existing podlings, and podlings where mentors have gone quiet but we
need to express higher expectations of mentors for new
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails
> about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release
> tarball from a podling.
>
> Activity on Bloodhound is picking up, and the project wants to release
