On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote: > It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails > about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release > tarball from a podling.
Reviewing a release when you are not directly involved as a developer is **really hard**. As an IPMC member yourself, have you ever reviewed a release for podling you were not involved with? There have been release candidates for podlings other than Bloodhound which have gone waiting. A detailed review from you on one of those -- with or without a vote, comprehensive or partial -- would be a welcome contribution. > Activity on Bloodhound is picking up, and the project wants to release > every couple weeks; I suspect that pace is not realistic while Bloodhound remains in the Incubator unless the podling manages to land a third core contributor who is also on the IPMC to go with yourself and Hyrum. > I hereby propose we extend the silent consensus rule to podling > release votes. -1 That's at odds with basic, ASF-wide rules for voting on releases. Marvin Humphrey --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
