Sorry, seems it was Luciano I agreed with. Sent from my tablet On Dec 1, 2012 8:43 AM, "Ross Gardler" <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote:
> I'm with Benson here. But we do need to acknowledge the problem identified > (again) by Branko. > > This is a mentoring problem not an IPMC problem. The IPMC needs to solve > it for existing podlings, and podlings where mentors have gone quiet but we > need to express higher expectations of mentors for new podlings. > > Branko, talk to your mentors. If that fails talk to the IPMC. > > Sent from my tablet > On Dec 1, 2012 7:36 AM, "Luciano Resende" <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails >> > about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release >> > tarball from a podling. >> > >> > Activity on Bloodhound is picking up, and the project wants to release >> > every couple weeks; yet the 0.2 vote thread sat in general@ for longer >> > than that. >> > >> > It's worse for these mails to go unanswered than if the release had been >> > vetoed. I hereby propose we extend the silent consensus rule to podling >> > release votes. >> > >> > -- Brane >> > >> > >> -1 for extending the silent consensus rule to podling release votes. BTW, >> have you got any IPMC binding votes from your mentors ? >> >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> >
