Justin,
Thanks for driving this! I may not have been +1, but this is important.
Please send links to all podling dev lists ASAP.
Thanks,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 4, 2020, at 8:03 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> So this passes with 6 +1 vest and one -0 vote. Thanks to everyone
Thanks to everyone that participated. The vote to release Release
Apache Zipkin Reporter (incubating) version 2.8.3 is now closed. It PASSED
with 3 (+1 binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes:
+1 Andriy Redko (binding)
+1 Willem Ning Jiang (binding)
+1 Sheng Wu (binding)
Vote thread:
https://lists.
Apologies for missing the voting link
The permalink for the voting can be found here.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/21014435bd33f7b514b54d5ed33641a2b562ceb47de1241037b34bb4@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
Thanks,
The Apache Zipkin (Incubating) Team
--
Hi -
I recently added a detailed clutch analysis page for each podling. It is
helpful for these situations as it lists all the releases in a flat sorted
manner:
https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/openwhisk.html
Similar analysis could be added for TLPs …
It also shows OpenWhisk 51 git reposit
We have a fun layout in Logging:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 07:46, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM David P Grove wrote:
> > ...For us, using the the version as the primary organizing metric in the
> > dist
Hi Dave,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM David P Grove wrote:
> ...For us, using the the version as the primary organizing metric in the dist
> isn't a great fit. Is there a precedent for doing otherwise (eg, first by
> component, then the active branches within each component)?...
As an example
"Henk P. Penning" wrote on 04/02/2019 07:13:11 AM:
>
>At the moment, OpenWhisk has in /dist/incubator/openwhisk/ :
>
>apache-openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating/
>apache-openwhisk-0.9.8-incubating/
>apache-openwhisk-0.10.0-incubating/
>apache-openwhisk-1.12.0-incubati
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:13 PM Henk P. Penning wrote:
>...If possbile, please remove 'older' releases from
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/openwhisk/ ...
Good point Henk!
Note that older releases are archived automatically under
http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/open
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Dave Grove wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:01:05 +
From: Dave Grove
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm,
Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)
Hi Dave,
We will proceed with the
Thanks to all who participated in this vote.
It has passed with 4 +1 (binding) votes (Matt Sicker, Justin Mclean, Krzysztof
Sobkowiak, Bertrand Delacretaz) and no other votes.
We will proceed with the 2.0.0 release of these three components.
Thanks also to Justin and Bertrand for pointing out a
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> This vote passes with 10 binding +1's, 3 non-binding +1, and no -1's ...
The mailing lists are ready, interested people can subscribe to the
dev list using dev-subscribe@openwhisk.incubator.a.o
Initial committers should have received more detail
I just added it, to unblock secretary actions.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM Craig Russell
wrote:
> I’m unable to find the proposal at
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals
>
> Is it me or is the proposal not included on that page?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> > On Nov 23, 2016, at
I’m unable to find the proposal at
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals
Is it me or is the proposal not included on that page?
Thanks,
Craig
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> This vote passes with 10 binding +1's, 3 non-binding +1, and no -1's
>
> Binding:
>
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> I plan to hold off on closing down the Ripple development resources
> until after the trademark issue is resolved to the point that it no
> longer needs to be discussed on the Ripple dev and private lists. (I
> would appreciate being alerte
Thank you Marvin, I will follow up on the trademark question and will get back
to you.
-Original Message-
From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 6, 2015 9:21 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: d...@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE][RE
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> I will attend to the retirement procedures.
The retirement procedures for Droids have been completed.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incub
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> As the Droids community vote was not contested, I plan to wait 72
> hours for lazy consensus of the IPMC, then to proceed with the
> administrative tasks of retirement.
As noted in the thread on Kalumet, lazy consensus is not appropriate
Okay get it done
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 19, 26 Heisei, at 18:34, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I gave the VOTE a few more days since it happened over a weekend.
>
> The VOTE has passed with 8 +1's (binding) and 1 +1 (non-binding), no
> -1's or +0's.
>
> +1's (binding) : John D.
Hi,
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
>> ...We also evaluated the vote if Apache Legal disagrees with "Flink", then
>> "Sfera" would win
Just a 2-cents note that Flink can sound very similar to Sling
depending on the speaker's accent and ambient noise ;-)
-Bertrand
---
Thanks a lot Mark
2014-04-06 17:23 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> The VOTE has passed with the following +1
>
> Olivier Lamy (IPMC),
> Romain Manni-Bucau (PMC),
> Jean-Louis Montiero (PMC),
> Jean-Baptise Onofre (IPMC)
>
> Mark Struberg (IPMC)
>
>
> No +0 nor -1.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> On Wed
The VOTE has passed with the following +1
Olivier Lamy (IPMC),
Romain Manni-Bucau (PMC),
Jean-Louis Montiero (PMC),
Jean-Baptise Onofre (IPMC)
Mark Struberg (IPMC)
No +0 nor -1.
LieGrue,
strub
On Wednesday, 2 April 2014, 12:18, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
wrote:
+1
>
>First release amazing
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>> ...We've done all that with comparatively few emails: at 466 messages...
>
> I'm having a hard time deciding if doing this in 466 messages is good
> news or not ;-)
To be p
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> ...We've done all that with comparatively few emails: at 466 messages...
I'm having a hard time deciding if doing this in 466 messages is good
news or not ;-)
Thanks very much Marvin for hanging in there and driving this to closure!
-Be
I guess Marvin can't count to the fourth Dave.
I also voted +1. Between Ant's and Chip's votes.
On Dec 20, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>
>> [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.
>> [ ] -1 No, do not apply
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>
>> [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.
>> [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment.
>
> The VOTE passes with the following binding votes:
>
>
Hi!
The VOTE has PASSED with the following +1
+1 (binding): Mark Struberg, Gerhard Petracek, Chris Mattmann, Christian
Grobmeier, Matze Wessendorf, Alan Cabrera, Matt Benson, Suresh Marru
+1 (non-binding): Sergio Fernández
no -1 nor +-0.
Thanks all for reviewing and voting!
LieGrue,
strub
Uh, +1 also! Drat, missed the window.
I wanted to mention that the Apache CloudStack PPMC has done a great job
on ensuring their branding comes over cleanly from Citrix, and has
really put work into building an independent community, so kudos are
definitely deserved.
- Shane
On 3/17/2013 1
gt; From: Mark Struberg
>> To: "deltaspike-...@incubator.apache.org"
>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache DeltaSpike 0.3-incubating
>>
>> T ime to tally the vote.
>>
>
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Vinayak Borkar wrote:
> Preston has accepted the invitation to be a committer. He would like
> "prestonc" as his username. His ICLA is on file already.
Thanks! Account requested.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---
Hi Jukka,
Preston has accepted the invitation to be a committer. He would like
"prestonc" as his username. His ICLA is on file already.
Thanks,
Vinayak
On 7/3/12 2:11 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
[It's best to avoid cross-posting between private and public lists.
Replying only on general
Hi,
[It's best to avoid cross-posting between private and public lists.
Replying only on general@]
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Vinayak Borkar wrote:
> Here is the final vote tally. I am sorry to bother you again with this
> request. But in lieu of our mentors, can you or someone else in the
The VOTE by Apache Incubator to propose to the board graduation of the VCL
podling to a TLP has passed. Tally of votes is as follows:
5 +1 votes (3 binding, 2 non-binding)
0 0 votes
0 -1 votes
Binding +1 votes:
Jukka Zitting
Kevan Miller
Matt Hogstrom
Non-binding +1 votes:
Aaron Peeler
Josh Th
Hi folks!
Time to tally the VOTE (IPMCs only):
+1 IPMCs carried over from podling vote: Mark Struberg, Gerhard Petracek
+1 (additional from general): Matze Wessendorf, David Blevins, Matt Benson
+0: none
-1: none
txs 4 all who voted!
I'll go on publishing the artifacts and prepare the dist ar
With 13 +1 votes, 0 +0 votes and 0 -1 votes, this release candidate is
promoted to a release.
Tally of votes is as follows:
+1 Votes: 13 total including 4 IPMC and 3 PPMC votes
Andrew Bayer (PPMC)
Mike Percy
Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Hari Shreedharan
Brock Noland
Patrick Hunt (IPMC)
Arvind
Hi folks!
72h later and I'm now tallying the votes.
We got
+1: 4x gpetracek, mbenson, matzew, struberg
+0: none
-1: none
+ a bunch of ppmc votes (10++ as listed in the original mail) and no -1
txs 4 all who voted!
I'll go on and continue with the release.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original M
You're absolutely right, I was looking at a bunch of your emails and your name
slipped in.
I should have said Benson. My apologies to both of you.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: sebb
Sent: 1/28/2012 1:56 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re:
On 28 January 2012 20:53, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> This vote passes with the required 3 +1's from Sebb, Ant, and Stefan. Thank
> you guys for taking the time to review and approve this release, ~Prescott>
> Date:
I did not vote +1.
I did not vote at all.
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:19:57 +
>>
This vote passes with the required 3 +1's from Sebb, Ant, and Stefan. Thank you
guys for taking the time to review and approve this release, ~Prescott> Date:
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:19:57 +
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4g incubating
> From: ant.el...@gmail.com
> To: genera
Our resolution contained a copy-paste error, correct version below:
## Resolution to create a TLP from graduating Incubator podling
X. Establish the Apache Empire-db Project
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Apologies for not voting. I simply have not had the time to look properly.
But I see tippy have the IPMC votes.
Congratulations
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Dec 23, 2011 12:21 AM, "Andy Seaborne" wrote:
> >> Please vote on this release:
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Ap
Thanks Ant - our dev list agrees that we should be adding some information
about what is being updated - we will include this in future releases.
With that, we have 3 votes we need, we appreciate your guy's time in revewing
our release.
~Prescott
--
Hereby I would like to mark this vote closed with the following result:
4 IPMC +1 votes (Benson, Martijn, Chris A, Alan)
4 PPMC +1 votes (Francis, Rainer, Benjamin, Eike)
1 community +1 vote (Dimitar)
no -1 or +0 votes
Combined with our empire-db-dev@ vote round we can conclude this vote
success
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Nick Burch wrote:
we're now waiting on infra[1] to have the cycles to create the lists.
The lists have now been created for the ODF Toolkit podling
Anyone who's interested in the project should sign up to the user and dev
lists. These are odf-us...@incubator.apache.org and
Benson Margulies wrote on 2011-08-11 01:18:30:
> From: Benson Margulies
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Date: 2011-08-11 01:19
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept ODF Toolkit for Incubation
>
> I am a historical contributor to the toolkit: if you need some
M
>>>
>>> Please respond to
>>> general@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>> To
>>>
>>> general@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>> cc
>>>
>>> Subject
>>>
>>> Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept ODF Toolkit for Incub
Rob Weir 写于 08/10/2011 08:58:23 PM:
> Rob Weir
> 08/10/2011 08:58 PM
>
> Please respond to
> general@incubator.apache.org
>
> To
>
> general@incubator.apache.org
>
> cc
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept ODF Toolkit for Incubation
>
> 20
2011/8/9 Ying Chun Guo :
>
> Nick Burch 写于 08/09/2011 06:47:05 PM:
>
>> Nick Burch
>> 08/09/2011 06:47 PM
>>
>> Please respond to
>> general@incubator.apache.org
>>
>> To
>>
>> general@incubator.apache.org
>>
>> cc
>&g
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Tom White wrote:
>> The vote passes, with 4 binding +1 votes (plus an additional two IPMC
>> votes from the Whirr dev thread [1]), 1 non-binding +1 vote, no 0
>> votes, and no -1 votes.
>>
>> The bindi
Nick Burch 写于 08/09/2011 06:47:05 PM:
> Nick Burch
> 08/09/2011 06:47 PM
>
> Please respond to
> general@incubator.apache.org
>
> To
>
> general@incubator.apache.org
>
> cc
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept ODF Toolkit for Incubation
>
Congratz!
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Tom White wrote:
> The vote passes, with 4 binding +1 votes (plus an additional two IPMC
> votes from the Whirr dev thread [1]), 1 non-binding +1 vote, no 0
> votes, and no -1 votes.
>
> The binding +1 votes:
> Chris A. Mattmann
> Mohammad Nour El-Din
> D
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
I would like to help as well if you still need more mentors :).
If you've got the spare cycles, please feel free to give us a hand!
Currently we have our minimum of 3 mentors:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html
Nick
-
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Dave Fisher wrote:
If you have been waiting for three volunteers before moving forward then
I'll raise my hand as well.
Thanks for the offer. We did hit the required number of moderators last
week, we're now waiting on infra[1] to have the cycles to create the
lists. Once
Hi Nick...
I would like to help as well if you still need more mentors :).
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> HI Nick,
>
> If you have been waiting for three volunteers before moving forward then I'll
> raise my hand as well.
>
> I'm looking forward to working with Yegor an
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Tom White wrote:
> The vote passes, with 4 binding +1 votes (plus an additional two IPMC
> votes from the Whirr dev thread [1]), 1 non-binding +1 vote, no 0
> votes, and no -1 votes.
>
> The binding +1 votes:
> Chris A. Mattmann
> Mohammad Nour El-Din
> Doug Cutting
HI Nick,
If you have been waiting for three volunteers before moving forward then I'll
raise my hand as well.
I'm looking forward to working with Yegor and you as mentors. I hope you won't
be waiting for me to walk my bike up the headlands while you look at the Golden
Gate!
:-D
Regards,
Dave
Hi Sam,
not that it is very important and would change anything but i have voted as
well ;-)
Juergen
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >
> > As the discussions on the ODF Toolkit threads seem to be winding down,
> > I would l
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>>
>>> As the discussions on the ODF Toolkit threads seem to be winding down,
>>> I would like to initiate the vote to accept the ODF Toolkit as an
>>>
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 12:05 +0100, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >> As the discussions on the ODF Toolkit threads seem to be winding down,
> >> I would like to initiate the vote to accept the ODF Toolkit as an
> >> A
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
As the discussions on the ODF Toolkit threads seem to be winding down,
I would like to initiate the vote to accept the ODF Toolkit as an
Apache Incubator project.
This vote will close 72 hours from now.
Vot
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Manfred A. Reiter wrote:
>> A (v)olunteer on the committer roster
>
> me too, if allowed
Oversight on my part. One that has no bearing on the process. Next
step for you is to send in an ICLA.
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
> M.
- Sam Ruby
---
> A (v)olunteer on the committer roster
me too, if allowed
M.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 6/13/2011 11:31 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Phillip Rhodes
>>
>> Mondo rad. But one quick question what does the (v) mean, listed after
>> some of the names in the voter list?
>
> I meant to either explain that or remove it. Oh well. :-)
>
> That was my own p
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Phillip Rhodes
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> >
>> > Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members. Quorum
>> > is 3 binding +1 yes votes. Once quorum is met,
On 6/13/2011 11:26 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>>
>>> Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members. Quorum
>>> is 3 binding +1 yes votes. Once quorum is met, if more +1 vot
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >
> > Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members. Quorum
> > is 3 binding +1 yes votes. Once quorum is met, if more +1 votes are
> > received than -1, the vote carries. Ot
Congratulations to all who want this to happen! Now lets do our best
to make it a success.
For all the new committers: Welcome to the ASF. I wish a good time
here with lots of fun.
Cheers,
Christian
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby wr
Thanks Arvind. I'll start going through the steps in
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#bootstrap over the
coming days.
Cheers,
Tom
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:43 PM, arv...@cloudera.com
wrote:
> With 19 +1 votes (11 binding), no -1 votes, and no 0 votes, the vote passes.
>
> Binding v
The 72 hours lazy consensus for the IPMC are up and we did get one
more +1 from Mohammad Nour El-Din** and no other votes.
The vote is successful and approved. I will make the artifacts available asap.
regards,
Karl
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> Time to call the vote on
Hello,
the vote was open for more than 72 hours and is now closed.
We received four binding +1 votes, one non-binding +1 vote and
non 0 or -1 votes.
The following people voted +1:
Tommaso Teofili (binding)
Ioannis Canellos (non-binding)
Grant Ingersoll (binding)
Hadrian Zbarcea (binding)
Benson
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 13:49 +0200, Michal Fojtik wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:20 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
>
> > The vote resulted in 8 +1, no 0's or -1's; two +1 votes were cast by
> > mentors (Carl and Jim)
> >
> > With that, the release of Deltacloud 0.3.0 RC3 is approved and I'll move
> >
On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:20 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
> The vote resulted in 8 +1, no 0's or -1's; two +1 votes were cast by
> mentors (Carl and Jim)
>
> With that, the release of Deltacloud 0.3.0 RC3 is approved and I'll move
> the artifacts to the proper place to make them the GA.
Excellent new
Thanks David, this sounds good. Things are a little slow due to the holidays,
but we'll get more of the steps done after.
Matei
On Dec 30, 2010, at 1:29 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> Matei Zaharia wrote:
>>
>> Thanks everyone for the positive reception! We'll get some help from Tom for
>> the n
Matei Zaharia wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone for the positive reception! We'll get some help from Tom for
> the next steps.
I did step 1 to add Mesos to the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
I chose "February, March, April". However if you want
to report in January too, or to
Best bet is to use the generated committers overview:
http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
because most other pages (whoweare, members, etc) are not up2date.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 12/22/10, Benson Margulies wrote:
> From: Benson Margulies
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Dec 22, 2010, at 4:37 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Eight binding +1 votes, no 0 or -1 vote, and one decorative
>> non-binding, assuming that http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html
>> is up to date
As Alan comment's shows, lis
Did I misread the web page or is it out of date?
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Dec 22, 2010, at 4:37 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> Eight binding +1 votes, no 0 or -1 vote, and one decorative
>> non-binding, assuming that http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.htm
On Dec 22, 2010, at 4:37 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Eight binding +1 votes, no 0 or -1 vote, and one decorative
> non-binding, assuming that http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html
> is up to date.
>
> BInding +1:
>
> Benson Margulies (Mentor)
> Chris Mattmann
> Mohammed Nour El-Din
> Bert
+1 from me
On 10/07/2010 11:52 PM, Richard Hirsch wrote:
Hi all,
after more than 72 hours, this vote has started and together with
those received on the podling list [1], we have now received
sufficient IPMC binding votes to proceed with the release of ESME 1.1.
We got 3 binding IPMC +1 votes
Thanks for the information
I'll copy the files this evening
D.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>> ...I'll proceed with distribution [2]. As a IPMC member, do I have access
>> to "www.apache.org/dist"? Do I just
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> ...I'll proceed with distribution [2]. As a IPMC member, do I have access
> to "www.apache.org/dist"? Do I just copy the material from
> http://people.apache.org/~rhirsch/esme/ directly into
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/esme/ and re
On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> I see, that +1 was for the pinging of the maven guys :-)
Yes.
Did not realise at the time that using +1 there was ambiguous; sorry about that.
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:31 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> >>
I see, that +1 was for the pinging of the maven guys :-)
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:31 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> Thomas Fischer (mentor)
>> Martijn Dashorst (mentor)
>> Bertrand Delacretaz (IPMC?)
>> You (IPMC)
>
> If you look back, I did not actually reg
On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> Thomas Fischer (mentor)
> Martijn Dashorst (mentor)
> Bertrand Delacretaz (IPMC?)
> You (IPMC)
If you look back, I did not actually register a +1 vote, and anyway I
am not on the IPMC.
The other three are on the IPMC, and did register votes.
>
>
Thomas Fischer (mentor)
Martijn Dashorst (mentor)
Bertrand Delacretaz (IPMC?)
You (IPMC)
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:50 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> The final result for our vote on the release of Apache Empire-db
>>
>> 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
>>
>>
>> +1 votes:
On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> The final result for our vote on the release of Apache Empire-db
>
> 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
>
>
> +1 votes: 4 binding
> 0 votes: 0
> -1 votes: 0
Who voted?
I can only count 3 +1 votes.
> Hereby we will publish this RC6 as the final 2.0.5-incub
Congrats!
Martijn
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> The final result for our vote on the release of Apache Empire-db
> 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
>
> +1 votes: 4 binding
> 0 votes: 0
> -1 votes: 0
>
> Hereby we will publish this RC6 as the final 2.0.5-incubating rele
The final result for our vote on the release of Apache Empire-db
2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
+1 votes: 4 binding
0 votes: 0
-1 votes: 0
Hereby we will publish this RC6 as the final 2.0.5-incubating release.
Thanks,
The apache empire-db team.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:43 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 23/
___
From: Niall Pemberton
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:25:55 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi Niall;
>
>>>>The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a v
s Niall for
jumping in.
-Matthias
>
> Niall
>
>> If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we
>> will try to be perfect :)
>>
>> Thanks;
>>
>> --Gurkan
>>
>>
>> ___
concerns in next M4 release that we
> will try to be perfect :)
not sure what exactly he said, but please file a JIRA ticket for it,
to not forget about it.
-Matthias
>
> Thanks;
>
> --Gurkan
>
>
>
> From: Niall Pemberton
> To: general@in
gt; blocker and although you responded you didn't allow time to see if he
> agreed with you. Giving a response is not reaching consensus.
> Sometimes you don't end up agreeing, but you need to allow time to see
> if its possible.
>
> Niall
>
>> If possible I would l
but you need to allow time to see
if its possible.
Niall
> If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we
> will try to be perfect :)
>
> Thanks;
>
> --Gurkan
>
>
>
> From: Niall Pemberton
> To: general@incu
e.
I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release!
If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we
will try to be perfect :)
Thanks;
--Gurkan
____
From: Niall Pemberton
To: general@incubator.apache.org
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
wrote:
> Hi;
>
> The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is
> successful.
>
> There are three +1 binding
The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an i
Agree with Bill. Attic isn't the place, and Incubator has plenty or
suspended/terminated/dead/inactive/whatever-the-politically-correct-term-is
and I see no point changing this.
-- Niclas
On Jul 28, 2009 4:41 AM, "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote: > Would this be moved to the at
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Would this be moved to the attic?
Probably not. The Attic is the collection of all released Apache
Projects. Podlings != Projects, and were never accepted as projects.
Do we want to charge the Attic with such additional burdens of then
completing all IP clearances that we
Would this be moved to the attic?
On Jul 27, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
What is the procedure for updating the Web site etc.? We need to let
outsiders know that they should not depend on this incubator
project. (There
are tons of really solid incubator projects that others d
What is the procedure for updating the Web site etc.? We need to let
outsiders know that they should not depend on this incubator project. (There
are tons of really solid incubator projects that others depend on so the
theory that "incubating" means don't depend on it is just that, a theory.)
Sanj
> In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
> months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
> suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with
XAP,
> I am raising this as a vote.
In favor:
Noel J. Bergman
On Apr 23, 2009, at 23:15 , Karl Pauls wrote:
The vote is successful. Thanks to everyone involved. We will get the
ball rolling asap.
To inform everybody: Niclas created the Confluence space and Jira
issue tracker and some issues to document the next steps:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
