Re: [Proposal] Windmill

2008-08-15 Thread Les Hazlewood
Hi Mikeal, Excellent answer, thanks very much for the clarification. I myself have enjoyed using Selenium in the past, and Windmill sounds like a definite improvement. It sounds great - I think it would be a worthwhile Incubator project. +1 (non-binding) Thanks, Les On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 6

Re: [Proposal] Windmill

2008-08-14 Thread Mikeal Rogers
Of those 3 it's the most like Selenium. As far as I know the "proxy spoof" method was pioneered by Selenium and we've continued to use/evolve that method of "tricking" the browser's same domain security policy. Our implementation of the test API has been very different from selenium as is o

Re: [Proposal] Windmill

2008-08-14 Thread Mikeal Rogers
Of those 3 it's the most like Selenium. As far as I know the "proxy spoof" method was pioneered by Selenium and we've continued to use/evolve that method of "tricking" the browser's same domain security policy. Our implementation of the test API has been very different from selenium as is o

Re: [Proposal] Windmill

2008-08-14 Thread Les Hazlewood
Just out of curiosity, where does this fit in versus, say, Selenium, MaxQ, Canoo WebTest, and others? There's nothing wrong if Windmill does the same stuff - I'm just curious what it can do in comparison. Cheers, Les On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Mikeal Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Th