On 08/06/16 15:59, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hey Tim,
>
> Thanks for volunteering. In order to be a mentor you need to be on the
> IPMC. Since you're already a member, its simply a matter of sending an
> email to private @ i.a.o indicating you want to join. We'll process it
> from there.
Yep, was
Hey Tim,
Thanks for volunteering. In order to be a mentor you need to be on the
IPMC. Since you're already a member, its simply a matter of sending an
email to private @ i.a.o indicating you want to join. We'll process it
from there.
John
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 5:28 AM Tim Ellison wrote:
>
Hi Tim,
That would be great. I have added you to the list of mentors on the Pirk
Proposal wiki page.
Thanks!
Ellison Anne
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
> Hi Ellison Anne,
>
> I'm also happy to be a mentor for Pirk.
>
> I am an Apache member, and my affiliation is IBM UK L
Hi Ellison Anne,
I'm also happy to be a mentor for Pirk.
I am an Apache member, and my affiliation is IBM UK Ltd (though I will
be participating on my own time, with IBM's approval, and not as part of
my day job).
Regards,
Tim
On 07/06/16 19:21, Ellison Anne Williams wrote:
> Hi Suneel,
>
> Gr
Hi Suneel,
Great - thanks!
I will add you to the list of mentors on the Pirk Proposal on the wiki.
Ellison Anne
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> If looking for mentors, I would be glad to jump in and I have no real
> organizational affiliation.
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at
If looking for mentors, I would be glad to jump in and I have no real
organizational affiliation.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Completely understand where you're coming from, Henry, and thanks for
> keeping us honest.
>
> I'll echo Joe's sentiment that I volunteered to me
Completely understand where you're coming from, Henry, and thanks for
keeping us honest.
I'll echo Joe's sentiment that I volunteered to mentor, not due to any
affiliation or interest at my dayjob, but instead my social network
connecting me with the project and a personal desire to help make
HI Joe,
Thanks for your reply.
Technically, that is what ALL mentors suppose to do. Wear different hats
when representing as Apache member.
But we all know that is not how it happens in reality. Most people nowadays
get paid to do open source by day employer so like it or not some influence
of t
Some more diversity among mentors would be nice, even though the mentors are
all impeccable Apache members.
The proposal template[1] says it is “useful” if that initial committers state
their affiliations. I think it would be helpful here.
Julian
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal
Henry
I totally understand the spirit of your statement but I want to be
clear in speaking for my own involvement here. I am participating in
this proposal and proposed podling as an apache member. That I happen
to work for hortonworks has absolutely nothing to do with it and
frankly I wish it w
One immediate concern is all mentors coming from Hortonworks.
I would strongly suggest to find more balance mentors.
I know we had this discussion about "fake" diversity stuff, but I strongly
advise to do more effort to get mentors from different background than one
company.
- Henry
On Tuesda
Hi Nick,
One of our driving goals in open sourcing Pirk is to build and foster a
diverse community around scalable, robust PIR. Although the initial
committers of Pirk come from a limited set of entities, we are absolutely
committed to recruiting and growing a diverse committing community.
Thanks
nection.
> Type it 50 times as fast as you can without looking at the screen. Or just
> swap the middle two letters...
> >>
> >> Mostly, if there's a chance it will be heard, read, or typed
> incorrectly it should--if it can--be avoided. This one just seems too easy
>
avoided. This one just seems too easy to get wrong.
>>
>> Hope that helps!
>> Benjamin
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Joe Witt [mailto:joe.w...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 11:15 AM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subj
On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 09:01 -0400, Ellison Anne Williams wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> We would like to discuss the proposal of a new project to the incubator -
> Pirk.
I note you have a champion and mentors all from a single company.
It's not clear whether initial committers are any more diverse.
Is t
..@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 11:15 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Pirk Incubation Proposal
>
> Benjamin,
>
> Definitely good to get solid discussion going on naming early.
> Curious to understand more of your perspective on what could
, 2016 11:15 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Pirk Incubation Proposal
>
> Benjamin,
>
> Definitely good to get solid discussion going on naming early.
> Curious to understand more of your perspective on what could be potentially
> offensive about Pir
s one just seems too easy to get wrong.
Hope that helps!
Benjamin
-Original Message-
From: Joe Witt [mailto:joe.w...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 11:15 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Pirk Incubation Proposal
Benjamin,
Definitely good to get
Benjamin,
Definitely good to get solid discussion going on naming early.
Curious to understand more of your perspective on what could be
potentially offensive about Pirk.
Thanks
Joe
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Benjamin Young wrote:
> Looks like a great project!
>
> I'd like to propose (ear
Looks like a great project!
I'd like to propose (early!) that you consider changing the name from Pirk,
however. It's too close to things that could easily be offensive or
misunderstood.
My personal recommendation would be "Piranha"
http://www.morewords.com/ has several more options if you sea
Extremely awesome to see this arrive!
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop:
21 matches
Mail list logo
