Matt Liotta wrote:
I didn't see a reply from anyone in regard to my message below. Just
curious if the interested parties have seen it.
saw your message, no time to look at it yet, sorry. I've flagged things
for follow-up later on.
busy as always :D
cheers,
- Leo Simons
--
Matt Liotta wrote:
I didn't see a reply from anyone in regard to my message below. Just
curious if the interested parties have seen it.
Yes, thanks a bunch.
You may want to announce it also here: http://jazilla.sourceforge.net/
They are workin on a Java-only browser.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi
On Jan 8, 2004, at 9:16 PM, Matt Liotta wrote:
I didn't see a reply from anyone in regard to my message below. Just
curious if the interested parties have seen it.
How about sending a short announcement mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] telling what you
have done so far, with what
Yes. However, if you want to have more audience, I suggest that
you also post an announcement on freshmeat.net.
I had the impression that specific members of this list were waiting on
the source code to be made available. I hadn't really intended on doing
a very public announcement like on Freshm
Matt Liotta wrote:
I didn't see a reply from anyone in regard to my message below. Just
curious if the interested parties have seen it.
Yes. However, if you want to have more audience, I suggest that
you also post an announcement on freshmeat.net.
Jochen
-
I didn't see a reply from anyone in regard to my message below. Just
curious if the interested parties have seen it.
Matt Liotta
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
On Jan 4, 2004, at 11:03 PM, Matt Liotta wrote:
From reading this list's archives it looks like I missed a couple
From reading this list's archives it looks like I missed a couple of
messages, so I have decided to join the list in the interim. Anyway,
based on the responses I have decided to go ahead and release the code
on Sourceforge under the Apache License. You can find the project at
http://sourceforg
Hi Matt,
(IANAL)
Matt Liotta wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. At this point, I am reluctant to release
the code under an Apache style license without a community behind it.
I don't want to see our code go into some proprietary project and
never benefit the community because the actual ope
While I certainly appreciate your concerns about releasing under a
bsd/apache style license without a community, please also consider the
difficulties of relicensing. If you change the license from [L]GPL to
bsd/apache, you will need to get something like written agreement from
every contribu
Le Jeudi, 1 jan 2004, à 17:57 Europe/Zurich, Matt Liotta a écrit :
...Right now my thinking is that we will release the code under the
GPL and put it up on Sourceforge
Note that you can use an Apache-like license on SourceForge.
The chaperon and jfor projects, for example, are hosted there b
Thanks for all the responses. At this point, I am reluctant to release
the code under an Apache style license without a community behind it. I
don't want to see our code go into some proprietary project and never
benefit the community because the actual open release was handled
incorrectly. Rig
Hi Matt,
Matt Liotta wrote:
> Nicola wrote:
I am personally very interested in this, having worked on a similar
project. In any case, it's a very interesting thing for Java in
general to have such a component opensourced. Because of this, I will
see to do all I can to help you.
+1 (which means
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Your administrative burden is *much* smaller. For example, by simply
registering the project, you get a CVS server, a mailing list system,
forums, a bug tracking system and all that stuff automatically.
I'm not sure that I understood the point. The infrastructure team doe
Matt Liotta wrote:
> the proposal doesn't seem to be inline with the document in two
> ways. First, there is no active development community for it.
> Second, [we] are no longer doing development on it
A community is important. It does not need to, and indeed it would be
better if it did not, com
> Your administrative burden is *much* smaller. For example, by simply
> registering the project, you get a CVS server, a mailing list system,
> forums, a bug tracking system and all that stuff automatically.
I'm not sure that I understood the point. The infrastructure team does all
of those t
Matt Liotta wrote:
Indeed, the proposal doesn't seem to be inline with the document in two
ways. First, there is no active development community for it. Second,
while the project was originally commercial in nature, we are no longer
doing development on it as it currently suits our needs. That
I am personally very interested in this, having worked on a similar
project. In any case, it's a very interesting thing for Java in
general to have such a component opensourced. Because of this, I will
see to do all I can to help you.
Thanks.
As for accepting it at Apache, we decide not on tec
Hi Matt,
> My company is interested in donating a project to the Apache
>Foundation. Specifically, we have created an updated HTML editor kit
A swing Editor Kit? Cool.
d.
***
The information in this e-mail is confiden
Matt Liotta wrote:
I am not sure if this the correct place, so if not I would hope someone
could point me in the correct direction. Additionally, I am not
subscribed to this list, so please reply directly.
My company is interested in donating a project to the Apache Foundation.
Specifically, w
Matt Liotta wrote:
My company is interested in donating a project to the Apache Foundation.
Specifically, we have created an updated HTML editor kit for Java 1.4
that supports the latest W3C standards for both HTML and CSS. The JDK
currently only supports HTML 3 and CSS 1. Additionally, we have
20 matches
Mail list logo
