Matt Liotta wrote:

Indeed, the proposal doesn't seem to be inline with the document in two ways. First, there is no active development community for it. Second, while the project was originally commercial in nature, we are no longer doing development on it as it currently suits our needs. That is not to say that we won't do bug fixes and other maintenance to it, but we just don't have any active development happening on it anymore.

In that case, as someone who went this way, I would suggest you consider seriously to choose another host, for example sourceforge.net. Reasons are:

- If the project won't be developed actively, it is comparatively
  unlikely that it will attract new developers.
- Your administrative burden is *much* smaller. For example, by simply
  registering the project, you get a CVS server, a mailing list system,
  forums, a bug tracking system and all that stuff automatically.
  Migrating your project to Apache is *lots* more work, in particular
  because you need to ask a lot of questions like "how do I get Bugzilla
  up and running" and the like.


Jochen


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to