Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-06-01 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
Things like the README: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/axis2/trunk/c/axiom/README Axiom/C was moved to a separate folder only recently, however it is still part of Axis2/C Here is a tutorial: http://ws.apache.org/axis2/c/docs/om_tutorial.html Please try the tutorial with 0.91 r

RE: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-31 Thread Nick Lothian
> > > > IIRC, FeedParser is languishing for need of a community. > > > > It really ought to just be dead. Kevin (original coder) decided to > > fork it externally so he wouldn't be tied up by our focus on not > > having single coder codebases (if I understand things correctly). > > There wasn't

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-31 Thread Torsten Curdt
> IIRC, FeedParser is languishing for need of a community. It really ought to just be dead. Kevin (original coder) decided to fork it externally so he wouldn't be tied up by our focus on not having single coder codebases (if I understand things correctly). There wasn't any interest in FeedParser

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-31 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/25/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nick Lothian wrote: > There's also Jakarta FeedParser, which has an Atom parser. > Also the ROME project (http://rome.dev.java.net/) has been debating > requesting incubation at Apache for quite a long time. We've got an > Atom parser, too.

RE: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-25 Thread Nick Lothian
> > Nick Lothian wrote: > > > There's also Jakarta FeedParser, which has an Atom parser. > > > Also the ROME project (http://rome.dev.java.net/) has been debating > > requesting incubation at Apache for quite a long time. We've got an > > Atom parser, too. > > IIRC, FeedParser is languishing

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-25 Thread James M Snell
Yes, personally I would love to collaborate with the ROME folks on this. Their project has a much broader scope in that it supports Atom plus all the various flavors of RSS, but there are a number of ways in which the two projects could feed off of and into each other. - James Noel J. Bergman wr

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-25 Thread Gav...
> What a great idea! The code looks very nice and I'd love to help. > > - Dave Yes , I agree and hope to join in and dev at some point. > > > > James M Snell wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The following is a new project incubation proposal. We welcome your >> feedback and would like to extend a invitat

Re: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-25 Thread James M Snell
Trademarked. I liked it too. http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=b0fu7h.2.1 Noel J. Bergman wrote: >> what was wrong with "Atomate"? I really liked that one. > > So did I, actually. Not that I have a horse in this race. > > --- Noel > > -

RE: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-25 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Nick Lothian wrote: > There's also Jakarta FeedParser, which has an Atom parser. > Also the ROME project (http://rome.dev.java.net/) has been debating > requesting incubation at Apache for quite a long time. We've got an > Atom parser, too. IIRC, FeedParser is languishing for need of a community

RE: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-25 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> what was wrong with "Atomate"? I really liked that one. So did I, actually. Not that I have a horse in this race. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-25 Thread Dave Johnson
What a great idea! The code looks very nice and I'd love to help. - Dave James M Snell wrote: Hello, The following is a new project incubation proposal. We welcome your feedback and would like to extend a invitation for participation including mentors. The proposal is also located at http

RE: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-25 Thread Nick Lothian
> > On 5/24/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does any one have any problems with simply calling this project > > "Atom"... as in, "The Apache Atom Implementation" ? > > > Well, unless I'm mistaken, it would actually be (at least) > the second Atom implementation at the ASF,

Re: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-25 Thread Torsten Curdt
Ok, so here are a few of the name options that seem to be the safest (in no particular order) Iaea (adapted, of course, from the U.N. nuclear watchdog group) Anu (Dims suggestion, sanskrit for "atom") Atomico (Spanish/Italian for "atomic") Dalton(Suggested by Robe

Re: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-25 Thread Torsten Curdt
How about Nucleus or Nucleo? Or in German: Atomkern ;-) nucleus is taken ...a blogging system cheers -- Torsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Abdera (was: Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-25 Thread James M Snell
Ok, given all the +1's in favor of the name Abdera, I've updated the proposal to use the new name. The wiki has been updated accordingly: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AbderaProposal - James - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-25 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 5/25/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/24/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, so here are a few of the name options that seem to be the safest (in > no particular order) > > Iaea (adapted, of course, from the U.N. nuclear watchdog group) > Anu

Re: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-24 Thread James M Snell
The project will consist of three distinct components a. An Atom parser/serializer. This is the Axiom-based code that is available in the tar referenced by the proposal b. An Atom Publishing Protocol Client... likely taking the form of a set of utility/helper objects based on the Commons HttpCli

Re: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-24 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
Hi James, (Greetings; hope u r doing well :)) How far does this project intend to go in implemention Atom? Is it a client side only, a tool to support Atom generation from some other app, APP, etc. etc.? (Sorry if this is an obvious answer question; I'm not an Atom expert at all.) Thanks, Sanj

Re: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-24 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 16:52 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > Of these, I like the last one, Abdera. +1. Sanjiva. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-24 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
Martin Cooper wrote: On 5/24/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, so here are a few of the name options that seem to be the safest (in no particular order) Iaea (adapted, of course, from the U.N. nuclear watchdog group) Anu (Dims suggestion, sanskrit for "atom"

Re: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-24 Thread Erik Abele
On 25.05.2006, at 01:47, James M Snell wrote: Ok, so here are a few of the name options that seem to be the safest (in no particular order) Iaea (adapted, of course, from the U.N. nuclear watchdog group) Anu (Dims suggestion, sanskrit for "atom") Atomico (Spanish/I

Re: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-24 Thread Yoav Shapira
+1 to Abdera. Atomic is my second choice of this list. Iaea is very hard to pronounce. Yoav On 5/24/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 to abdera. On 5/24/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/24/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ok, so here ar

Re: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-24 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 to abdera. On 5/24/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/24/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, so here are a few of the name options that seem to be the safest (in > no particular order) > > Iaea (adapted, of course, from the U.N. nuclear watchdog group)

Re: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-24 Thread Martin Cooper
On 5/24/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, so here are a few of the name options that seem to be the safest (in no particular order) Iaea (adapted, of course, from the U.N. nuclear watchdog group) Anu (Dims suggestion, sanskrit for "atom") Atomico (Spanish

Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

2006-05-24 Thread James M Snell
Ok, so here are a few of the name options that seem to be the safest (in no particular order) Iaea (adapted, of course, from the U.N. nuclear watchdog group) Anu (Dims suggestion, sanskrit for "atom") Atomico (Spanish/Italian for "atomic") Dalton(Suggested by Rober

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-24 Thread James M Snell
I've gone through all of the suggestions offered here and have done a variety of trademark/google searches on each. I think for every one that there has been at least two or three relevant hits either on google or USPTO. A community chosen name is great, so long as it doesn't cause any potential t

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-24 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, On 5/24/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, it was worth a shot. I've been stewing over possible name selections for a couple days and can't seem to come up with any strong possibilities. Why not take the stuff that's been suggested so far (there have been 10+ ideas, no?), pu

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-24 Thread James M Snell
Ok, it was worth a shot. I've been stewing over possible name selections for a couple days and can't seem to come up with any strong possibilities. - James Martin Cooper wrote: > On 5/24/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Does any one have any problems with simply calling this pr

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-24 Thread Martin Cooper
On 5/24/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does any one have any problems with simply calling this project "Atom"... as in, "The Apache Atom Implementation" ? Well, unless I'm mistaken, it would actually be (at least) the second Atom implementation at the ASF, since Roller has one a

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-24 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hola, Wouldn't that be confusing? I can see users asking "is Atom the spec or the implementation or both?" I'd prefer a name that's not the same as the spec name. Yoav On 5/24/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does any one have any problems with simply calling this project "Atom"..

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-24 Thread James M Snell
Does any one have any problems with simply calling this project "Atom"... as in, "The Apache Atom Implementation" ? - James Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 5/22/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> The following is a new project incubation proposal. We welcome your >> feedba

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
Hi All, I too am interested in this project, I am from Axis2/C project and was involved with implementing Axiom in C for Axis2/C project. Hopefully, I too can help from Axiom domain. It is great that this is going to use Axiom, hopefully leading to lots of improvements to Axiom itself.

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread James M Snell
Good catch. Ok, we'll keep looking :-) Davanum Srinivas wrote: > http://www.google.com/search?q=+%22wave+systems%22+software seems too > close for comfort. > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Davanum Srinivas
http://www.google.com/search?q=+%22wave+systems%22+software seems too close for comfort. On 5/23/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, I did run a search. There were a number of hits for the term "wave", but none of which seem particularly relevant/conflicting. (one business consulta

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread James M Snell
Yes, I did run a search. There were a number of hits for the term "wave", but none of which seem particularly relevant/conflicting. (one business consultant firm, a cigarette brand, a medical science research firm, swimming goggles, etc) - James Davanum Srinivas wrote: > James, > > did you searc

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Davanum Srinivas
James, did you search for trademarks? http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=tess&state=vmko9c.6.51 thanks, dims On 5/23/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alrighty. Thanks for the all the name suggestions. I've been Googling like crazy and the best candidate seems to be "Wave" The t

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread James M Snell
Alrighty. Thanks for the all the name suggestions. I've been Googling like crazy and the best candidate seems to be "Wave" The three initial committers are fine with that name. If there are no objections, I can go ahead and update the proposal to use that name. - James Garrett Rooney wrote: > O

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On May 23, 2006, at 5:16 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 5/23/06, David N. Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: James M Snell wrote: > Not good: http://www.jtauber.com/demokritos > Garrett Rooney wrote: >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democritus >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomism There

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 06:19 -0700, Paul Querna wrote: > > I am currently using the xmlTextReaderRead of libxml2, and it appears > that Axiom is also using that underneath. It has a pull parser abstraction layer to support multiple pull parsers. We currently use libxml2 but that's slow because it

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Davanum Srinivas
"Anu" (Sanskrit word for Atom - [1]) [1] http://www.google.com/search?q=atom+anu+sanskrit On 5/23/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for all the name suggestions given thus far. Keep 'em coming. The two names I have in mind (in order of preference) are: 1. Wave 2. Atomos -

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread James M Snell
Thanks for all the name suggestions given thus far. Keep 'em coming. The two names I have in mind (in order of preference) are: 1. Wave 2. Atomos - James - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread James M Snell
+1. it would be VERY helpful to have an Axiom expert advising on the project, even if it's not in a formal mentor role. - James robert burrell donkin wrote: > On 5/23/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, > > > hi eran > > I'm Eran Chinthaka, one of the contributors from Axio

RE: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Glen Daniels
Jumping in with a quick $0.02: > There's also Atomate, a play on automate. > > -- > Martin Cooper I really like that, as it's both a play on automate and also "atom-mate", i.e. a useful companion to Atom. +1! --Glen - To uns

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Martin Cooper
On 5/23/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hola, I'll jump in with a couple of suggestions, although my record on this is dismal (I don't think any of my name suggestions have ever been accepted in the incubator ;)): From the nuclear domain: - Apache Reactor (borrowing on the nuclear c

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Eran Chinthaka
Paul Querna wrote: > Paul Fremantle wrote: >> > > I am a little scared of the Axiom C code right now.. Maybe its really > not that scary to someone who knows it :) Don't be scared its apache code :). Axis2/C team recently released Axis2/C 0.9 and 0.91 based on Axiom/C implementation. > > I am

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Paul Querna
Paul Fremantle wrote: On 5/22/06, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Possibly even donate code for a C based parser. Sounds good. There is also a C version of the Apache Axiom xml model that the proposed ARI codebase has been written with which should make it easier. The Axiom C code h

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 09:10 -0400, Yoav Shapira wrote: > > And the kicker: Apache Schmelzverfahren (german word for fusion) !! +1! Sanjiva. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hola, I'll jump in with a couple of suggestions, although my record on this is dismal (I don't think any of my name suggestions have ever been accepted in the incubator ;)): From the nuclear domain: - Apache Reactor (borrowing on the nuclear connotation of Atom) - Apache Furnace (similar idea)

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Eran Chinthaka
Please see my comments in-line. robert burrell donkin wrote: > On 5/23/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, Hi, > > > AIUI not as a mentor. it's a particular role involving oversight and the > current concensus amongst the membership is that this is something that > should b

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Ian Holsman
what about OPPENHEIMER ?... On 23/05/2006, at 10:16 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 5/23/06, David N. Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: James M Snell wrote: > Not good: http://www.jtauber.com/demokritos > Garrett Rooney wrote: >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democritus >>http://en.wikip

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 5/23/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, hi eran I'm Eran Chinthaka, one of the contributors from Axiom and Axis2 projects. I also would like to mentor this project as I have worked a lot with Axiom and involved in integrating Atom and RSS feed generation in to Axis2. i

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 5/23/06, David N. Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: James M Snell wrote: > Not good: http://www.jtauber.com/demokritos > Garrett Rooney wrote: >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democritus >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomism There are a bunch of names here, and on the related pages (neutron

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread David N. Welton
James M Snell wrote: > Not good: http://www.jtauber.com/demokritos > Garrett Rooney wrote: >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democritus >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomism There are a bunch of names here, and on the related pages (neutron, fermion, etc...): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-23 Thread Paul Fremantle
On 5/22/06, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Possibly even donate code for a C based parser. Sounds good. There is also a C version of the Apache Axiom xml model that the proposed ARI codebase has been written with which should make it easier. The Axiom C code hasn't been split off into

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-22 Thread Eran Chinthaka
Hi, I'm Eran Chinthaka, one of the contributors from Axiom and Axis2 projects. I also would like to mentor this project as I have worked a lot with Axiom and involved in integrating Atom and RSS feed generation in to Axis2. But I read the FAQ [1] and it states you have to be a member of ASF to be

RE: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-22 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Don't forget that although this may be about Atoms, there is Wave-Particle duality, so these things are also waves, which makes for interesting imagery, since they propogate as a wave front across the web. --- Noel - To

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-22 Thread Garrett Rooney
On 5/22/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not good: http://www.jtauber.com/demokritos FTR, the names we've kicked around include "Covalence" (too close to Covalent), "Valencia" (Spanish for "Valence"), atomos (Latin root for "Atom"), and chimie (French for chemistry). Our lawyers did

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-22 Thread James M Snell
Not good: http://www.jtauber.com/demokritos FTR, the names we've kicked around include "Covalence" (too close to Covalent), "Valencia" (Spanish for "Valence"), atomos (Latin root for "Atom"), and chimie (French for chemistry). Our lawyers didn't like "Covalence" or "Valencia" so those were shot d

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-22 Thread Garrett Rooney
On 5/22/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's fine. We've gone through a number of names internally and pretty much gave up on trying to come up with something good. Alternative name suggestions would be greatly appreciated. :-) How about "Democritus"? For those who haven't been

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-22 Thread James M Snell
That's fine. We've gone through a number of names internally and pretty much gave up on trying to come up with something good. Alternative name suggestions would be greatly appreciated. :-) - James Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On May 22, 2006, at 12:23 PM, James M Snell wrote: > >> The following is

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-22 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On May 22, 2006, at 12:23 PM, James M Snell wrote: The following is a new project incubation proposal. We welcome your feedback and would like to extend a invitation for participation including mentors. The proposal is also located at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AriProposal The initial

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-22 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 5/22/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: = ARI, an Atom Reference Implementation Proposal = ahhh - acronyms :-) seems 'tis the fate of ASF acronyms to become first names: JAMES -> james ARI -> 'ari ...? it's good to see the young lightweight 'arry Acronym joining his brother Jam

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-22 Thread James M Snell
Paul Querna wrote: >[snip] > I am also interested in helping mentor the project, and to work on a C > implementation of its functionality. Possibly even donate > code for a C based parser. > Excellent. Thank you. - James - T

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-22 Thread Paul Querna
Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 5/22/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> The following is a new project incubation proposal. We welcome your >> feedback and would like to extend a invitation for participation >> including mentors. >> >> The proposal is also located at >> ht

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-22 Thread James M Snell
Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 5/22/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> The following is a new project incubation proposal. We welcome your >> feedback and would like to extend a invitation for participation >> including mentors. >> >> The proposal is also located at >>

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-22 Thread Garrett Rooney
On 5/22/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, The following is a new project incubation proposal. We welcome your feedback and would like to extend a invitation for participation including mentors. The proposal is also located at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AriProposal Th