> > On 5/24/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does any one have any problems with simply calling this project > > "Atom"... as in, "The Apache Atom Implementation" ? > > > Well, unless I'm mistaken, it would actually be (at least) > the second Atom implementation at the ASF, since Roller has > one already. Simply calling it Atom implies it has some > special status, especially in the phrase you use above (i.e. > "The Apache Atom Implementation"). So I would not be in > favour of that name. > > --
There's also Jakarta FeedParser, which has an Atom parser. Also the ROME project (http://rome.dev.java.net/) has been debating requesting incubation at Apache for quite a long time. We've got an Atom parser, too. Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Global Summit 2006: Technology Connected Futures -- 17-19 October, Sydney, Australia. Visit our website http://www.educationau.edu.au/globalsummit2006 for further details. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ IMPORTANT: This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain private or confidential information. If you think you may not be the intended recipient, or if you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete all copies of this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not reproduce any part of this e-mail or disclose its contents to any other party. This email represents the views of the individual sender, which do not necessarily reflect those of education.au limited except where the sender expressly states otherwise. It is your responsibility to scan this email and any files transmitted with it for viruses or any other defects. education.au limited will not be liable for any loss, damage or consequence caused directly or indirectly by this email. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
