Thank you all for your comments. I assume everyone's questions
so far have been satisfactorily answered and concerns addressed.
Below is the resolution updated as Bill suggested. In the absence
of further discussion I plan to close the vote at the end of the
business day tomorrow (US/Mountain time
+1 (non-binding)
On 10/14/07, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> >>> I would like to see the legal stuff resolved first. I don't believe
> >>> that we should release a project with existing copyright issues.
+1 for graduation.
Craig
On Oct 14, 2007, at 11:39 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I would like to see the legal stuff resolved first. I don't
believe
that we should release a project with existing copyright
issues. If
this
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I would like to see the legal stuff resolved first. I don't believe
that we should release a project with existing copyright issues. If
this were to mean that stdcxx graduation would wait until November's
Board meeting, I'
On Oct 12, 2007, at 3:51 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
After over two years in the incubator, two releases under our belt
(one snapshot and one official release) and a third one coming,
the stdcxx community with the support of our mentors feel that we
are ready to propose to the Incubator PMC to gradua
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm looking forward to the incubator spending more energy directed
at the fledgling (and floundering) efforts which need a great share
of our attention.
Do you have something specific in mind? Do you have some list of projects where
the Incu
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > I feel that we start down a slippery slope when we graduate
> > projects which are "not yet" compliant, but "will be".
> So if I'm to understand correctly, you would be satisfied once
> svn/trunk is shown to pass the RAT tests?
I would hav
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Who said it wasn't compliant?
And I quote again:
==
Martin Sebor wrote:
> I'm still cleaning up the license headers on trunk. Once we're
> all satisfied with the result and after we merge trunk to 4.2.0
> I plan to take your suggestion and solicit help from som
On Oct 13, 2007 4:28 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I feel that we start down a slippery slope when we graduate projects which
> are "not yet" compliant, but "will be". When? Craig points out that it has
> been some months since the issue was raised by you, and it is still not
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I feel that we start down a slippery slope when we graduate projects which are "not yet"
compliant, but "will be". When? Craig points out that it has been some months since the
issue was raised by you, and it is still not resolved. Hence:
So if I'm to understand cor
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> RAT is a later addition to their tool kit
RAT is a tool that attempts to verify compliance. The things to which RAT
verifies compliance are not new, even if RAT is new relative to stdcxx coming
into the Incubator.
I feel that we start down a slippery slope when we
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In fact, haven't people called for providing a release
build to be a graduation requirement?
Yes - I seem to recall that proposition was not made a 'requirement'.
But in answer to your question; *yes* they have performed an incubating-
release and demonstrated that they
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > I would like to see the legal stuff resolved first. I don't believe
> > that we should release a project with existing copyright issues. If
> > this were to mean that stdcxx graduation would wait until November's
> > Board meeting, I'd be comf
On Oct 13, 2007, at 12:38 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Martin,
After reviewing
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--ready-to-graduate-
tf4386148.html#a12504335
I have two issues. First:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Bill Rowe wrote:
With a caviat - I'd expect the crew to run the next possible release
tarb
On Oct 13, 2007 12:38 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to see the legal stuff resolved first. I don't believe that we
> should release a project with existing copyright issues. If this were to
> mean that stdcxx graduation would wait until November's Board meeting, I'
Martin,
After reviewing
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--ready-to-graduate-tf4386148.html#a12504335
I have two issues. First:
Martin Sebor wrote:
> Bill Rowe wrote:
> > With a caviat - I'd expect the crew to run the next possible release
> > tarball against the RAT tool to make sure every copyri
On 10/12/07, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After over two years in the incubator, two releases under our belt
> (one snapshot and one official release) and a third one coming,
> the stdcxx community with the support of our mentors feel that we
> are ready to propose to the Incubator PMC
Martin Sebor wrote:
After over two years in the incubator, two releases under our belt
(one snapshot and one official release) and a third one coming,
the stdcxx community with the support of our mentors feel that we
are ready to propose to the Incubator PMC to graduate stdcxx to
a Top Level Proj
On 10/12/07, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...We invite everyone to vote to approve this proposal...
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We invite everyone to vote to approve this proposal.
+1
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 11, 2007 6:51 PM, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After over two years in the incubator, two releases under our belt
> (one snapshot and one official release) and a third one coming,
> the stdcxx community with the support of our mentors feel that we
> are ready to propose to the I
21 matches
Mail list logo
