+1 (non-binding) On 10/14/07, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > >> Noel J. Bergman wrote: > >>> I would like to see the legal stuff resolved first. I don't believe > >>> that we should release a project with existing copyright issues. If > >>> this were to mean that stdcxx graduation would wait until November's > >>> Board meeting, I'd be comfortable with that. How extensive is the > >>> issue, and how long will it take to complete? > > > >> It's not a 'copyright issue' per se (as all the paperwork is in > >> place), but rather ensuring the license headers follow the currently > >> recommended template. Many of our other projects don't follow the > >> templates - and, yes, this will be a blocker for a release - but I > >> don't think it needs to hold up graduation. > > > > Is it just a matter of the current template versus an older one? Is > > everything properly under at least some form of the ASF license header? It > > seems that it should be a rather straightforward and mechanical item to > > clear up. > > I agree, and I believe these concerns have been addressed. The record > of changes made to resolve this issue can be found here (the specific > patches are referenced in the subtasks): > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-552 > > Martin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta4/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
