+1 for graduation. Craig
On Oct 14, 2007, at 11:39 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:Justin Erenkrantz wrote:Noel J. Bergman wrote:I would like to see the legal stuff resolved first. I don't believe that we should release a project with existing copyright issues. If this were to mean that stdcxx graduation would wait until November'sBoard meeting, I'd be comfortable with that. How extensive is the issue, and how long will it take to complete?It's not a 'copyright issue' per se (as all the paperwork is in place), but rather ensuring the license headers follow the currently recommended template. Many of our other projects don't follow the templates - and, yes, this will be a blocker for a release - but I don't think it needs to hold up graduation.Is it just a matter of the current template versus an older one? Iseverything properly under at least some form of the ASF license header? It seems that it should be a rather straightforward and mechanical item toclear up.I agree, and I believe these concerns have been addressed. The record of changes made to resolve this issue can be found here (the specific patches are referenced in the subtasks): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-552 Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
