Hello PMC,
As a committer on the XAP Project, I would also vote +1 (non binding of
course) for moving the project from incubation to the attic. We have seen
little community develop around the project and have been making little/no
progress on the code lately.
Thanks for everyones help throughout
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> > In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least
> 4
>> > months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
>> > suspension. Having re
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/16/09, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least
> 4
> > months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
> > suspe
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least
4
> > months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
> > suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with
XAP,
> > I am r
On 2/16/09, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
> months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
> suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
> I am raising this as a vote.
-1
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
I am raising this as a vote.
--- Noel
+1.
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
I am raising this as a vote.
--- Noel
+1
--kevan
On Feb 16, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at
least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing
with XAP,
I am r
+1.
Eddie
On Feb 16, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
wrote:
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at
least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009,
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
> In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
> months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
> suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
> I am raising this as a vote.
>
> ---
+1
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
>> months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
>> suspension. Having reached,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
> months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
> suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
> I am raising
+1
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
> months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
> suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
> I am rai
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
> months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
> suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with
> XAP,
> I am rais
+1
Craig
On Feb 16, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at
least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing
with XAP,
I am
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1. I see little chance of XAP being resurrected at this point.
--
Martin Cooper
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
> months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
> suspe
18 matches
Mail list logo
