Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman <n...@devtech.com> wrote:
> > In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least
4
> > months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
> > suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with
XAP,
> > I am raising this as a vote.
> -1
>
> Suspension implies wrongdoing and fault, and that this disciplinary
> process is temporary
>
> IMO XAP should be archived into an Attic
Huh? So when I suspend my laptop, it did something wrong and needs to be
disciplined? That hasn't been true since I stopped running MS-Windows
Vista!
The project is dormant, sleeping, idle, hibernating, and can be mothballed,
put away in the attic, put on ice. If and when there is further community
interest, it can be woken, thawed, taken out of the attic, recommissioned,
reactivated, unboxed.
Is your -1 really solely on the word?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
