Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
> The phrase "independent PMC status" is pertinent. Reading on in the
> charter you will find wording that expands the above core, however the
> expansion is hard to rationalize beyond incorporation of "full projects"
> within umbrella PMCs. I think it is totally rea
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Why are we discussing/considering the possibility of anything other
than a TLP incubation?
...
Read this [1] and you will have all the answers.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/resolution.html
Nicola:
I'll draw your
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Why are we discussing/considering the possibility of anything other
than a TLP incubation? If a project is comming in as part of another
project than an existing PMC is bringing it it in and doing so in
accordance with the policies, procedu
Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Why are we discussing/considering the possibility of anything other than
> a TLP incubation? If a project is comming in as part of another project
> than an existing PMC is bringing it it in and doing so in accordance
> with the policies, procedures and due-diligence
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Why are we discussing/considering the possibility of anything other than
a TLP incubation? If a project is comming in as part of another project
than an existing PMC is bringing it it in and doing so in accordance
with the policies, procedures and due-diligence that ha
Why are we discussing/considering the possibility of anything other than
a TLP incubation? If a project is comming in as part of another project
than an existing PMC is bringing it it in and doing so in accordance
with the policies, procedures and due-diligence that have been granted
under the
