Stephen McConnell wrote: > Why are we discussing/considering the possibility of anything other than > a TLP incubation? If a project is comming in as part of another project > than an existing PMC is bringing it it in and doing so in accordance > with the policies, procedures and due-diligence that have been granted > under their respective charters. We may well be making a wopping big > blunder here in that much of what we are discussing undermines the > responsibilities already discharged to existing PMCs.
no, we aren't. it has been explicitly stated that any project coming in to the asf from outside *must* come through the incubator. it is only projects started *within* an existing tlp, solely by tlp members, that need not. and i believe the board will take a very, very dim view of any tlp that tries to do an end-run around this by bringing in an outside group of people and then subsequently importing their codebase. > Instead, I propose that we re-focus our attention to role of the > Incubator PMC as the adjunct to the board in dealing with new TLP > candidates. no, i think not. our current focus is correct and appropriate. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
