On 26.09.2014 20:03, jan i wrote:
> On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
>> (that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
>> code bases written "before my time"):
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:04 AM,
>I¹m also not sure what history you mean. The only donation that I know of
>that there was no follow through was the Swiz donation.
Also for context: The Swiz folks never submitted the software grant so
technically it hasn't been donated.
-Alex
--
On Sep 28, 2014, at 7:51 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> For some projects automatic committership may work, but given Flex's history
> with donations it's probably not suitable choice of action.
I don’t see what’s different about Flex. The rationale to give them committer
rights is to increase th
For more context, there has been only one prior donation from
non-committers to Flex and that was completed only 26 days ago. All but
one other donation has come from Adobe and are parts of existing Flex
products that Adobe provided before the transition to Apache.
-Alex
On 9/28/14 9:51 AM, "Jus
Hi,
For some context the Flex project has has several donations that have ended up
get little or no involvement from the community or the people who donated them
after donation. For most projects donations (once a project is top level) are
reasonably rare and from what I can see most donations
On 28 September 2014 15:24, sebb wrote:
> On 26 September 2014 19:03, jan i wrote:
> > On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> >
> >> Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
> >> (that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
> >> code bases wr
On 26 September 2014 19:03, jan i wrote:
> On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
>> (that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
>> code bases written "before my time"):
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1
On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
> (that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
> code bases written "before my time"):
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
> wrote:
> >
Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
(that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
code bases written "before my time"):
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> OK. I will give you my personal opinion since you are seeking to d
, September 26, 2014 9:42 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Code Donations and Committer Righs
Hi Ross,
Yes, I am asking here because of lack of consensus in the Flex project.
In this particular scenario the Flex TLP has received a donation from
non-committers. I know one of our
yone you know is
>interested (http://aka.ms/msopentechjobs)
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 8:57 PM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Code Donations and Committer Righs
>
>I'd like to kn
! Ask me for details if anyone you know is interested
(http://aka.ms/msopentechjobs)
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 8:57 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Code Donations and Committer Righs
I'd like t
I'd like to know: if a code base is donated to Apache under a Software
Grant, do most projects grant committer rights to the code authors at the
same time or do most projects require that the donors submit patches as
other non-committers normally do?
Thanks,
-Alex
---
13 matches
Mail list logo
