On Sep 28, 2014, at 7:51 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:

> For some projects automatic committership may work, but given Flex's history 
> with donations it's probably not suitable choice of action.

I don’t see what’s different about Flex. The rationale to give them committer 
rights is to increase the probability that the code will be maintained after 
the donation. If the new committer does not follow through, there’s no harm 
done.

I’m also not sure what history you mean. The only donation that I know of that 
there was no follow through was the Swiz donation.

Harbs

Reply via email to