OK thanks for that feedback. These contributions were not
specifically assigned to me by the comitters, so I think there
copyright status is disputable. I dont think we need to consider this
aspect further, and should just proceed as normal.
regards Malcolm Edgar
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:14 AM
On Jul 30, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
One possible complication to this is that all the code in Click
currently has a copyright header assigned to Malcolm Edgar, even if
they were contributed from other comitters. So in committing code
people have explicity assigned their copyright t
One possible complication to this is that all the code in Click
currently has a copyright header assigned to Malcolm Edgar, even if
they were contributed from other comitters. So in committing code
people have explicity assigned their copyright to me. This was a
habit I picked up from working on T
Let's take this to legal-discuss and see what comes out. After all,
that
is where the lawyers lurk.
Good idea.
Also keep in mind that the problem scope is not limited to the
projects coming to the incubator. It also affects contributions to the
existing projects by new people. Currently a
I feel your pain and I know that Cayenne was in a bad spot because of
this. But if we can ease the process for others, why not?
Let's take this to legal-discuss and see what comes out. After all, that
is where the lawyers lurk.
Ciao
Henning
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 10:42
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
>> My personal understanding here is, that Ahmed (and any other
>> contributor) contributed that code to a project that is already under
>> AL2. So there is no n
On Jul 30, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
My personal understanding here is, that Ahmed (and any other
contributor) contributed that code to a project that is already under
AL2. So there is no need to track down the contributors and/or rewrite
code where the contributor can no
My personal understanding here is, that Ahmed (and any other
contributor) contributed that code to a project that is already under
AL2. So there is no need to track down the contributors and/or rewrite
code where the contributor can not be tracked down. The AL allows
relicensing under AL2 ( :-) ),
Correct me if I am wrong, but what you are saying is that there should
be a record somewhere (such as a Click prior email archive?) where a
person states his intent to donate the code? What if this person was a
committer, and stated his intent by quietly committing the code?
In any case, "r
Thanks for pointing this out; in case of Click, this probably means that
all current contribution, which are already covered by Apache licenses
are fine. So, while it is nice to track down the original authors and
get ICLAs from them to explicitly assign the code to the ASF, it is
actually not real
Hi Andrus,
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Is there existing code in Click written by Ahmed?
Yes. His contribution history can be seen here:
http://fisheye3.atlassian.com/changelog/~author=amohombe/click/
However much of that code is in a his sandbox which is not part of
Click distribution and can
On Jul 27, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Is there existing code in Click written by Ahmed? As getting an
ICLA or rewriting this code will be required as a part of the IP
clearance process.
That isn't quite true. The ASF requires documentation that the original
author has licensed
Hi Andrus,
There are a number of Click Extras controls written by Ahmed, but
nothing in the core. These controls will probably have to be moved
into a separate non Apache project.
regards Malcolm Edgar
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Malcolm,
>
>
Hi Malcolm,
Is there existing code in Click written by Ahmed? As getting an ICLA
or rewriting this code will be required as a part of the IP clearance
process. The ideal outcome would be for Ahmed to send an ICLA,
regardless of his future participation plans, but that's of course up
to hi
Phil's ICLA is just for the IP vetting.
regards Malcolm Edgar
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, thanks for updating, we will continue without Ahmed initially,
> hopefully he can join the project soon.
>
> Will Phil become a committer (he was
Ok, thanks for updating, we will continue without Ahmed initially,
hopefully he can join the project soon.
Will Phil become a committer (he was not in the initial set, so there
might be a vote required) or is that ICLA just for the IP vetting?
Ciao
Henning
On Sun, 2008-
Hi,
Thanks for the update on the ICLA's.
Ahmed unfortunately wont be able to join the project initially for
personal health reasons and won't be providing an ICLA.
You should have also received an ICLA from Phil Barne an early
committer to the Click project.
I will still try and obtain ICLA's f
Hi,
this is the current status for the Click incubation:
- ICLAs for Malcolm, Bob and Naoki have been received. ICLA for Ahmed is
still missing. As soon as this shows up, I will request accounts for
Click
- Mentors need to prepare a status page for the click incubation, as
described at http://in
18 matches
Mail list logo