On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 30, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: >> My personal understanding here is, that Ahmed (and any other >> contributor) contributed that code to a project that is already under >> AL2. So there is no need to track down the contributors and/or rewrite >> code where the contributor can not be tracked down. The AL allows >> relicensing under AL2 ( :-) ), so the code in the repository is fine. > > The policy may have changed, but the above was NOT true when Cayenne was > incubating. What I suspect is happening is that there is no *policy* as > such, and instead we have a range of opinions.
It starts to sound like that. > What you (and Roy) are saying makes sense to me, but it goes against > everything I know about the practiced IP clearance process at Apache. In my experience this is the same. Wicket had to track down ICLA's for all committers on the project. Fortunately we didn't have that many core folk, so this was rather easy. Martijn -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
