William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The principal is this; there is NO discussion without a motion on the floor,
period. Ever.
Please give me a moment. It seems that I need to re-calibrate my irony
meter.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubs
Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> If you're saying that we can't have a discussion without that also
> implicitly being a vote, how is this supposed to work? I hope I'm just
> missing something obvious, or misunderstanding you completely.
I'm saying, if you stop and phrase your thread as a vote, you will
On 10/23/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
> Right, but this is a proposal, not a vote.
Break, folks.
There is a REALLY basic principal from parliamentary procedure that exists
for a very good reason, to avoid long pointless debate without
decisions...
Martin Cooper wrote:
> Right, but this is a proposal, not a vote.
Break, folks.
There is a REALLY basic principal from parliamentary procedure that exists
for a very good reason, to avoid long pointless debate without decisions...
The principal is this; there is NO discussion without a motion
