On 7/11/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Board meetings are another case entirely, but having never listened in
on one, I don't know how practical they'd be to hold via other means.
I suspect it would be difficult though.
Any one can dial in to the Board meetings. It's honestly no
On 7/11/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> "IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g.
> Q&A between available committers and interested users/contributors),
> although such sessions should be archived an
On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
"IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g.
Q&A between available committers and interested users/contributors),
although such sessions should be archived and made available to those
not able to attend. However, using IR
On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
"IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g.
Q&A between available committers and interested users/contributors),
although such sessions should be archived and made available to those
not able to attend. However, using I
I'll wait to see if there's anymore feedback on Cliff's wording, then
will add this to the committers guide.
-jean
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> On 7/11/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > below) and other recent threads, here's what I would propose also be
>> > doc'd:
>> >
>> >
> also no dev/arch decissions is mentioned.
Just to be clear, this proposed piece of text was meant to supplement
what we have now that categorically excludes off-list decision making.
yes. What I tried to say is: "I like that the *do no dev/arch
decissions* offline is mentioned in your text"
On 7/11/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> below) and other recent threads, here's what I would propose also be
> doc'd:
>
> "IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g.
> Q&A between available committers and interested users/contributors),
> although such
below) and other recent threads, here's what I would propose also be
doc'd:
"IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g.
Q&A between available committers and interested users/contributors),
although such sessions should be archived and made available to those
not able to at
More explicit documentation is usually a good thing, and having clear
docs stating that decisions must only take place on the mailing lists
is no exception...however, that's not really what this thread was
about.
Most of this thread has been about what non-decision-making role
should IRC play, if
