Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

> On Jul 20, 2016, at 4:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Jul 20, 2016 18:15, "Leif Hedstrom" > wrote: >> >> >>> On Jul 20, 2016, at 4:10 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 6:09 PM Leif Hedstrom wrote: >>> > On Jul 12, 2016, at 3

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

On Jul 20, 2016 18:15, "Leif Hedstrom" wrote: > > > > On Jul 20, 2016, at 4:10 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 6:09 PM Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > > >> > >>> On Jul 12, 2016, at 3:08 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote: > >>> > >>> The results are in and voting is now closed. The vote

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

> On Jul 20, 2016, at 4:10 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 6:09 PM Leif Hedstrom wrote: > >> >>> On Jul 12, 2016, at 3:08 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote: >>> >>> The results are in and voting is now closed. The votes: >>> >>> [7] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incu

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 6:09 PM Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > > On Jul 12, 2016, at 3:08 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote: > > > > The results are in and voting is now closed. The votes: > > > > [7] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator > > > > Great! > > Incubator PMC: As the sponsor of this Po

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

> On Jul 12, 2016, at 3:08 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote: > > The results are in and voting is now closed. The votes: > > [7] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator Great! Incubator PMC: As the sponsor of this Podling, we would like to request that you officially call this vote, and

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

The results are in and voting is now closed. The votes: [7] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator Phil Sorber (binding) Leif Hedstrom (binding) Josh Elser (binding) Pierre Smits (non-binding) Jacky Li (non-binding) Nick Kew (binding) Daniel Gruno (binding) [0] +/-0 No

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) also. With regards, Daniel. On 07/09/2016 10:08 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 18:16 -0600, Jan van Doorn wrote: > >> I don't think the association with ATS would hold us back, but I do think it >> could give prospective users of Traffic Control the impression that it

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 18:16 -0600, Jan van Doorn wrote: > I don't think the association with ATS would hold us back, but I do think it > could give prospective users of Traffic Control the impression that it only > works with ATS. This is true now, but won't be in the future. I'm not sure a bit

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

> On Jul 8, 2016, at 12:27, Nick Kew wrote: > > Just wondering if you could elaborate on one point: > > "We don't want to become a sub-project of ATS though, because we > believe we should add other caching proxies as they are deemed to be a > valuable addition to the Traffic Control CDN. " >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 09:05:29 -0600 Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > The proposal follows, you can also access the wiki page: > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TrafficControlProposal > > > > Any more thoughts on this [VOTE] and proposal? Any concerns? Seems > like we could use a couple of more bindi

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

> On Jul 1, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Jan van Doorn wrote: > > Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator. > > [] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. > [] -1 Do not accept Traffic Control into t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Good luck! Regards, Jacky > 在 2016年7月6日，下午4:11，Pierre Smits 写道： > > +1 (non-binding) > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > ORRTIZ.COM > OFBiz based solutions & services > > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > On Tue, J

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Good luck! > > > Jan van Doorn wrote: > >> Following

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck! Jan van Doorn wrote: Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator. [] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator [] +0 Abstain. [] -1 Do not accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

> On Jul 1, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Jan van Doorn wrote: > > Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator. > > [] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. > [] -1 Do not accept Traffic Control into t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:00 AM Jan van Doorn wrote: > Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator. > > [] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. > [] -1 Do not accept Traffic Control into t

[VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator. [] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator [] +0 Abstain. [] -1 Do not accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator because ... This vote will be open for at least