On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 18:16 -0600, Jan van Doorn wrote: > I don't think the association with ATS would hold us back, but I do think it > could give prospective users of Traffic Control the impression that it only > works with ATS. This is true now, but won't be in the future.
I'm not sure a bit of internal organisation will make much difference once you start listing TC+TS and TC+Other as equally valid options. But I don't want to make an issue of it. > Only one or two people actively work on both projects, the development > communities are mostly separate. OK, thanks. > I'm not familiar with the HTTPD and APR history, is there a lesson we should > learn from that? The main issue we've found is that with a close relationship and with a large overlap between the dev teams, we've often found a development in HTTPD driving one in APR, even to the point of "we need a new APR release that'll support [new HTTPD feature]". At the same time, the original reason for the separation - that APR has applications outside httpd (Apache SVN being one such) - works well. On reflection, you probably have a cleaner separation than that anyway. +1 (binding) to your vote. -- Nick Kew --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
