> On Jul 8, 2016, at 12:27, Nick Kew <n...@apache.org> wrote: > > Just wondering if you could elaborate on one point: > > "We don't want to become a sub-project of ATS though, because we > believe we should add other caching proxies as they are deemed to be a > valuable addition to the Traffic Control CDN. " > > To me that raises a couple of questions: > - Would association with ATS really hold you back? > - How much overlap is there between the dev communities? > I'm wondering if the experience of separating HTTPD and APR > might just be relevant to this issue. >
I don't think the association with ATS would hold us back, but I do think it could give prospective users of Traffic Control the impression that it only works with ATS. This is true now, but won't be in the future. Only one or two people actively work on both projects, the development communities are mostly separate. I'm not familiar with the HTTPD and APR history, is there a lesson we should learn from that? Thanks, JvD (apologies if you get this twice, I sent this out earlier, but never saw it make the list) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
