Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

2003-12-26 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Berin Lautenbach wrote: ... I note that at the moment we have reserved the right for the Incubator PMC to vote if so desired. Does everyone think we should remove that potential out of the policy? I think so now. It should not be of our business to challenge the deci

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

2003-12-26 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Berin Lautenbach wrote: ... I note that at the moment we have reserved the right for the Incubator PMC to vote if so desired. Does everyone think we should remove that potential out of the policy? I think so now. It should not be of our business to challenge the decisions of other PMCs. If an e

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

2003-12-24 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Noel J. Bergman wrote: Rodney Waldhoff wrote: The notion of automatically accepting projects already accepted by a sponsor seems like a good one. It's not very clear from the process docs that this is the case. As said before, the docs are in need of a major overhaul. Hopefully, somewhere in t

RE: [RESULT][VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

2003-12-23 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Martin Cooper: > Noel J. Bergman: > > I see RT used on a few lists, I don't consider RT to convey a useful > > semantic. > The first time I saw RT was in a message from Sam (Ruby) on the Gump list, > where he expanded it as "Random Thought", meaning something along the lines > of "I just had an id

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

2003-12-23 Thread Martin Cooper
"Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > I don't know what "AISI" stands for, but the way. > > For that matter, what's RT stand for in [RT]? > > AISI == As I See It > RT == Random Topic > > I see RT used on a few lists, I don't c

RE: [RESULT][VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

2003-12-23 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > AISI, the reason there was no summary is that the vote was halted on the > grounds that it was improper. Because DB had already voted to accept the > project, the Incubator does not vote to accept it (ballot 1). If you want > to view ballot 2 as a

RE: [RESULT][VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

2003-12-23 Thread Rodney Waldhoff
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > > I've noticed that a disturbing number of VOTE threads on this list never > > have a corresponding RESULT summary, so here's the result for the vote I > > recently called: > > AISI, the reason there was no summary is that th

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

2003-12-23 Thread Morgan Delagrange
Actually I think 72 hours have to pass after my nomination is recognized by a Board member (or something like that). So, I have a few more days until I'm officially recognized by the Board. --- Rodney Waldhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As I understand >

RE: [RESULT][VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

2003-12-23 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > I've noticed that a disturbing number of VOTE threads on this list never > have a corresponding RESULT summary, so here's the result for the vote I > recently called: AISI, the reason there was no summary is that the vote was halted on the grounds that it was improper. B

[RESULT][VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

2003-12-23 Thread Rodney Waldhoff
I've noticed that a disturbing number of VOTE threads on this list never have a corresponding RESULT summary, so here's the result for the vote I recently called: "Ballot 1: Accept Axion for incubation" passes with at least 5 binding +1s (Noel Bergman, Davanum Srinivas, Greg Stein, Nicola Ken Baro