Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> AISI, the reason there was no summary is that the vote was halted on the
> grounds that it was improper. Because DB had already voted to accept the
> project, the Incubator does not vote to accept it (ballot 1). If you want
> to view ballot 2 as a vote to release it, I guess you could say it failed.
> But I think we tried moving from the pro forma phase to actually trying to
> work with you. :-)
>
> --- Noel
> The notion of automatically accepting projects already accepted by a
> sponsor seems like a good one. It's not very clear from the process
> docs that this is the case.
As said before, the docs are in need of a major overhaul. Hopefully,
somewhere in the axion or near axion-graduation timeframe.
> As a point of clarification, does that mean that someone with the
> appropriate karma can create a new podling via lazy consensus
There are *very* few people with the karma and know-how to create a
project's resources. So the "karma" aspect of your question is rather moot.
However, we have established the policy that if another PMC asks the
Incubator to accept a project, we will do so.
> I don't know what "AISI" stands for, but the way.
> For that matter, what's RT stand for in [RT]?
AISI == As I See It
RT == Random Topic
I see RT used on a few lists, I don't consider RT to convey a useful
semantic.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
