OK,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> The code stays put and wouldn't implode.
Ah, OK. When Dave Fisher said "Any interested party should be sure to
make their fork shortly." it seemed to be implying that the code would
disappear unless it was forked immediately.
Looking
Wait, does that mean that the source for all retired podlings
disappears from all ASF repos (no archive) when a podling is retired??
If that's the case, I vote -1 for this retirement, and all future such
votes. If that's not the case, then sure. But I'm against anything
that potentially results
Sounds interesting. I wonder if the Camel community would be
interested in this as well?
Phil
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> Just coming back into this.. I want to be realistic here... I'm kind
> of pushing back on my
+1
Looking forward to this...
Phil
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Neelesh Salian
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> Thanks for putting this together.
>
> On May 31, 2017 9:46 AM, "Marcelo Vanzin" wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Wed, May 31,
I don't understand the desire to use a closed-source, proprietary,
locked-down walled-garden application like Slack to begin with. Why
not use one of the several open-source look-a-like versions that are
available? Or use Gitter, which is about to go Open Source[1].
[1]:
https://venturebeat.co
+1
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Edward Capriolo
wrote:
> +1 nonbinding.
> GossipYa Heard?
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:14 PM, P. Taylor Goetz
> wrote:
>
> > Following the discussion thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to
> accept
>
+1
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Stack wrote:
> I'm late, but let me add my +1 anyways.
> St.Ack
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Poorna Chandra wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Tephra proposal was sent out for discussion last week. The propo
+1
On Feb 29, 2016 12:57, "Henry Saputra" wrote:
> +1 (Binding)
>
> - Henry
>
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Mnemonic
> > into the Apache Incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for at least
> >
+1
On Feb 26, 2016 09:38, "Daniel J Debrunner" wrote:
> +1 ( non-binding - member request to join IPMC is pending)
> Thanks,Dan.
On Jan 28, 2016 6:28 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week.
>
> The complete discussion thread is available here:
>
>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201601.mbox/%3CCA%2B%3DKJmvj4wyosNTXVpnsH8PhS7jEyzk
a paragraph in the background section discussing how Apache
> > > avoids hostile forks of projects, because we don't want to fork
> > > communities. We've also added Larry McCay, P. Taylor Goetz, and Phillip
> > > Rhodes to the proposal.
> > >
> >
I contributed to this project a little bit (as an outside consultant) back
when Cisco was running it, and would be interested in staying involved with
it if this happens.
Phil
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> RIght. That's w
+1
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Konstantin Boudnik
> wrote:
>
> > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Groovy from the Incubator.
> > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Groovy fro
+1
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Seetharam Venkatesh <
venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote:
> +1, the proposal looks very interesting. We have a metadata and governance
> solution built in Apache Atlas (http://atlas.incubator.apache.org) and use
>
I just want to say, I'm very excited about this project, and am happy
to contribute any way I can. I've been thinking a lot lately
about how to build a scalable RDF system using something
like Spark, so this definitely intrigues me.
Phil
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
On Thu
I'm pretty excited to see this as well. I'll help any way I can.
Phil
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
> Not surprisingly, there is already some positive feedback. If you don't
> already have a champion in mind, I'd b
Same here. Not that it matters as far as admission to the incubator
(that vote is over now anyway), but I think a lot of people (including
potential users of Samza) would like to see more about how it compares
& contrasts with other stream oriented systems.
Phil
This message optimized for indexi
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion
> over the last few days has been quite positive.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, bring Drill into
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept S4 for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to S4 incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject S4 for incubation
+1
Cheers,
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr..
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>
> I have read the guide to participation:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html
>
> and I understand from there that people shouldn't simply jump in as an
> initial committer without a short introduction and with
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Leo Neumeyer wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a
> distributed streaming platform written in Java.
>
> Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal
>
A
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Accumulo for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to Accumulo incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject Accumulo for incubation
>
> This vote will close 72 hours from now.
+1
---
> I think that the ASF and ASF incubator leadership should consider it a
> priority to foster such communication. And this means asking the
> questions I asked before, e.g,. "you guys are trying to do the same thing
> as... Have you talked them?" Consider it "Open-Source Project
> Parenting."
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Avery Ching wrote:
> Hi and good friday to you all,
>
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Giraph for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to Giraph incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject Giraph for incubation
>
+1
Phil
ou and hope you get some time to
> take a look at it.
>
> Avery
>
> On Jul 15, 2011, at 6:42 PM, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Avery Ching ach...@yahoo-inc.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a link to the proposal in our GitHub wi
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Avery Ching wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a link to the proposal in our GitHub wiki:
>
> https://github.com/aching/Giraph/wiki/Apache-Incubator-Proposal
>
>
Should the contents of this proposal to be copied to the incubator section
of the ASF wiki, at something like:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Avery Ching wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose Giraph as an Apache Incubator project. Giraph is a
> large-scale graph processing infrastructure (inspired by Pregel) that runs
> entirely on Hadoop. Giraph applications and MapReduce jobs coexist on
> shared
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose Oozie to be an Apache Incubator project.
> Oozie is a server-based workflow scheduling and coordination system to
> manage
> data processing jobs for Apache Hadoop.
>
>
> +1
h this project.. I've added my
name to the proposal wiki under "initial committers." If anybody wants to
know more
about who I am, there's probably an "intro" email from me already in the
Incubator email archives, or I can certainly post again if anybody cares.
Phillip Rhodes
> Please vote for the retiring of the Stonehenge podling:
>
> [] +1 - please retire
> [] +/-0
> [] -1 - please don't retire, because...
+0
I have to admit, I wasn't very familiar with this project, until this
"RETIRE" thread came up.
I find the idea very intriguing and am curious if there's anybo
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >
> > Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members. Quorum
> > is 3 binding +1 yes votes. Once quorum is met, if more +1 votes are
> > received than -1, the vote carries. Ot
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [X ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
>
> This vote will close 72 hours from now.
>
>
(non-binding)
Phil
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:39 PM, arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
> As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
> days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
> Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full text
> of the proposal can be f
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
> I'd like to call a vote.
>
> At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
> a
> link to the document in the wiki:
> http
enerally see supporting this project as
a "Good Thing"
on multiple levels, so here I am.
Cheers,
Phillip Rhodes
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Danese Cooper wrote:
>
> 4) most customers use OOo on Windows
>
> Last time I checked, the percentage of Windows users was still in the high
> 90s percentile. But it builds on the various Linux distros, as well as
> MacOSX and a bunch of other platforms, each with
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> All,
>
>
> Please list your questions in short sentences. Avoid discussions about
> licensing. Please don't refer to open discussion on TDF/ASF community
> - we all know we want to collaborate. If this all really happens is
> not case o
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> The expression 'land-grab' in here bothers me.
>
> I understand (if not agree with) the 'deep philosophy justification'
> of the FSF for a particular licensing strategy.
>
> I understand the views of individuals who don't want to benefit
>
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Ian Lynch wrote:
> Look guys, this is going round in circles. I'm not an ASF or TDF member but
> I spent quite a lot of time and effort on OOo and ODF in the past so I care
> what happens. The fact is the software grant is made. My understanding is
> that if the co
IANAL, but since neither the ASF nor the TDF have any authority to compel
their
members to behave in any certain way, and since the ASF is technically made
up
exclusively of individuals (as I understand it) this seems way off base to
me. This
isn't IBM and Novell discussing dividing up a market, u
but since *both* of my
grandfathers, and my dad, and me, are
all named Sidney, my parents chose to use my middle name when I was young,
and I've more or less always
stuck to it, only writing "Sidney Phillip Rhodes" on legal / official
documents. :-)
Sid
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:00 PM, sebb wrote:
> Specifically, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas
>
> but again I don't see your name
>
>
Actually, it is there. It's just under my first name "Sidney" instead of my
middle name, which I usually go by. :-)
That is, a
Hmmm... I was never a committer, somebody else applied that patch... but I
was asked to fax in a CLA. Not sure if that helps or not. :-)
Phil
On Jun 2, 2011 8:25 PM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Phillip Rhodes
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Ju
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
> Under the list of proposed committers, yes.
> --
Awesome. I should already have a CLA on file, from when I made a
contribution to Roller Weblogger a few years back. That was, however, some
time ago. Is there a way to confirm that my CL
For those of us who are interested in volunteering to support the new Apache
OpenOffice podling,
what is the correct procedure to state such interest? Should one add
themselves to the
wiki version of the proposal under "committers?" Or "other?"
Thanks,
Phillip
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> This whole topic seems to suffer from malformed or uninformative subject
> lines.
>
> I submit that it's not the purview of the ASF or the Incubator PMC to
> achieve world peace, or whirled peas, or a single project for open
> source docume
> All I'm trying to say is that if we are focusing more on
> repeating what a missed opportunity it was, rather than
> moving past it and trying to figure out how to take advantage
> of the current opportunities that are now open to us, then
> we need to adjust priorities a bit
+1
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:40 PM, arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
> Greetings All,
>
> We would like to propose Sqoop Project for inclusion in ASF Incubator as a
> new podling. Sqoop is a tool designed for efficiently transferring bulk
> data
> between Apache Hadoop and structured datastores such as rel
+1
49 matches
Mail list logo
