Re: [VOTE] Apache DeviceMap .Net clients 1.0.0

+1 --kevan On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:33 AM, eberhard speer jr. wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > this is the (source only) release email for Apache DeviceMap .Net > clients : > > Apache DeviceMap csharp incubating 1.0.0.0 > and > Apache DeviceMap vbnet incub

Re: Board Report Reminder

Thanks! I had a temporary wiki login problem (was on the wrong computer), went to add it and was already there... --kevan On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:11 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > Are you going to enter this report on the wiki? > > I

Re: Board Report Reminder

I've gotten the DeviceMap Community to generate the following report. Sorry for the delay. Bertrand and I have been pretty busy. If any spare mentor-energy is available, I'm sure we'd welcome the help with the community... We need to move the community forward or consider the alternatives... Devi

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On Jun 4, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> As I said, it does look good. But I don't see the LinkedIn Copyright >> in any files under tools/. The copyright/license header should remain >> in the files that you copied into our repos.

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On Jun 4, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:58 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >> >>> On Jun 4, 2013 4:22 AM, "ant elder" wrote: >>>> >>>

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Jun 4, 2013 4:22 AM, "ant elder" wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >> >>> >>> Simple as that. >>> >> >> If only. >> >> This is the old "what goes in the NOTICE file" debate that has >> probably caused more em

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On Jun 2, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > Apache Incubator tools > Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation > > This product includes software developed at > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). > > This distribution contains code from the LinkedIn Corporation

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On Jun 2, 2013, at 10:09 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2013, at 5:29 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 3 June 2013 00:37, Alan Cabrera wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 4:01 PM, sebb wrote: >>> > Modified: incubator/public/trunk/tools/NOTICE.txt > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/v

[RESULT}[VOTE] Retire the Kitty project from incubation

This vote passes with 10 +1 votes and no others. +1 votes from: Ross, Dave, Christian, Benson, Mark, Bertrand, Daniel, Alan, Jukka, and Kevan. Will begin the retirement process for the project. --kevan On Oct 14, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > All, > The Kitty community has

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Kitty project from incubation

Here's my +1 --kevan On Oct 14, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > All, > The Kitty community has voted to retire the project. I'm now moving the > retirement vote to the Incubator PMC. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1 to retire the Kitty project &

[VOTE] Retire the Kitty project from incubation

All, The Kitty community has voted to retire the project. I'm now moving the retirement vote to the Incubator PMC. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1 to retire the Kitty project [ ] 0 for Don't care [ ] -1 for No, please keep it alive (please provide arguments why) Thanks, --kevan -

Re: License/Notice/Disclaimer file location in tree and modifcations of License headers in contributed files

On Aug 10, 2012, at 2:32 PM, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Kevan, > > in Jira there is a special checkbox when you attach files "Grant rights of > files to the ASF". From what I understood that is sufficient if the author > of the code contributes to the ASF. > > However as our mentors on t

Re: License/Notice/Disclaimer file location in tree and modifcations of License headers in contributed files

On Aug 10, 2012, at 7:31 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote: > There is still one open questions here, let me summarize it again: > > OCAD[1] contributed files via JIRA[2] to the ASF, > Those files already had a license header (GPL) example: [3]. > > What is the correct way to handle that? > Repla

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "August2012" by KevanMiller

On Aug 1, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Apache Wiki wrote: >> + VCL graduated from the Incubator. > > Indeed it did, thanks for the reminder! > > We should update our records to reflect that, VCL is still listed as > incubating in http://inc

Re: Old projects with incomplete copyright diligence

On Jul 7, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > The following projects haven't signed off on the copyright checklist item: > > 2009-02-09 kato > 2009-02-13 stonehenge > 2009-05-13 socialsite > 2010-05-19 amber > 2010-09-05 nuvem > 2010-11-12 kitty > 2010-11-24 stanbol > 2011-06-13 op

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)

On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:40 AM, sebb wrote: > On 26 June 2012 13:28, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote: >> Thanks for the feedback and review so far! >> >> About correct attribution of ASF JARs >> Do they need a reference in the LICENSE file at all ? > > The recipient of the package needs to be able to

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)

On Jun 26, 2012, at 7:43 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote: > @Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates? > > About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license > > > "The NOTICE document is f

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 3)

On Jun 22, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Kevan- Hi Chris, Thanks for elaborating. > > Please appreciate that there is universal agreement that (1) listing > and maintaining all transitive dependencies and licenses is a sound > service It's more than "sound". We are required to mee

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 3)

On Jun 22, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Alan D. Cabrera > wrote: >> This is why documenting transitive dependencies is so dangerous. > > Should we stop? No. The solution is that projects should control their dependencies (direct/transitive) so

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 2)

On Jun 21, 2012, at 10:44 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > +1 > > If this is going to be a new hard requirement the people who feel strongly > about this should add something to Rat or write some kind of a plugin. Check out the recent 0.3 Airavata release. I didn't review it, until just now. Howe

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 2)

On Jun 21, 2012, at 6:33 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: >>> If a project has a gazillion dependencies, regardless of whether those >>> dependencies are direct or transitive, that makes dealing with licensing >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 2)

On Jun 21, 2012, at 10:46 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Marvin Humphrey >> wrote: >>> Obeying dependency license provisions is not an ASF policy, it's a legal >>> requirement. Fairness is immaterial. >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 2)

On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:42 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Hi, Jun, > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Jun Rao wrote: >> I agree that to the benefit of users, it would be reasonable for Apache >> projects to include license/notice for all dependant jars (directly or >> indirectly) in a release. Ho

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 3)

On Jun 21, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Great. We're not distributing the Snappy codec, so- according to the > reasoning of board@, legal@, and the IPMC on the 0.7.0 release- the > NOTICE and LICENSE files do not require updates. We're not starting > from first principles at every rel

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 3)

Thanks for the improvements Joe! I'm still -1 based on the licensing and binary artifacts in your source. (binding) --kevan On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:19 PM, Joe Stein wrote: > Hello, > > This is the third candidate for the second incubator release for Apache > Kafka, version 0.7.1-incubating. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 2)

On Jun 21, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: >> On Jun 21, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >>> With that said, I think it's something good and extremely useful to strive >>> f

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 2)

On Jun 21, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > On Jun 19, 2012, at 8:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On Jun 18, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Jun Rao wrote: >> >>> Kevin, >>> >>> Thanks for the comments. Just want to clarify on your p

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 2)

On Jun 18, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Jun Rao wrote: > Kevin, > > Thanks for the comments. Just want to clarify on your points on > LICENSE/NOTICE. Our LICENSE/NOTICE covers all jars included in the source, > not those pulled in during building. We had a long discussion during our > 1st release and in th

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 2)

On Jun 18, 2012, at 9:34 PM, Joe Stein wrote: > I uploaded a md5 checksum > http://people.apache.org/~joestein/kafka-0.7.1-incubating-candidate-2/ to > go along with the detached signature that was generated already Thanks. > > starting the kafka server is in the quick start > http://incubato

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 2)

Things that I've noted: I don't see a checksum for your release in http://people.apache.org/~joestein/kafka-0.7.1-incubating-candidate-2/ -- your release manager will need to generate a checksum for the release. It would be nice if your archive extracted into an apache-kafka-0.7.1-incubating d

Re: [VOTE] graduation of VCL as a TLP

+1 --kevan On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Josh Thompson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > IPMC members, > > Given the positive feedback from Jukka Zitting and no negative feedback, I'd > like to request a vote for the graduation of VCL as a TLP to be proposed to > th

Re: [DISCUSS] graduation of VCL as a TLP

On Jun 8, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Josh Thompson wrote: >> The VCL project would like to graduate. We think we have fulfilled all of >> the >> requirements for graduation. > > Sounds great! I remember from your May report that you were

Re: Invitation to join Apache Kafka as a committer

same error > as Joel below. Can the appropriate permissions be added to my account as > well? Username: prashanthmenon > > Thanks!!! > Prashanth > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Joel Koshy wrote: > Works now. > > Thanks, > > Joel > > On Wed, M

Re: Invitation to join Apache Kafka as a committer

On May 23, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > -kafka-private > +kafka-dev > +general > > Ahh, account was only created. According to root: > >> Only PMC chairs can grant karma. If needed, please post to the general@/ >> dev@/private@ list of your project asking for someone with suffi

Re: Wink status (Was: Shepherds for podling reports)

On May 9, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for the report, Wink, and for the review, Dave! >> >> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> From activity it looks like this project should have grad

Re: Missing reports

On Apr 5, 2012, at 6:36 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > Reports from DeviceMap, Kitty, Oozie, Syncope and Tashi are still > missing (deadline was yesterday). If possible, please report by the > end of the week so we'll have time for review and feedback. Otherwise > please report again next mo

Re: [VOTE] Apache BVal as a TLP

+1 --kevan On Feb 8, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > Hi... > > It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache > BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or > not, [1], [2] and [3]. > In the past few weeks there has been a [V

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache BVal as a TLP

+1 (binding) --kevan On Feb 7, 2012, at 6:29 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > Hi... > > It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache > BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or > not, [1], [2] and [3]. > In the past few weeks there has

Re: [VOTE] DeviceMap to join the Apache incubator

ando (dot) com > > == Required Resources == > > === Mailing lists === > * devicemap-dev @ incubator.apache.org > * devicemap-commits @ incubator.apache.org > * devicemap-private @ incubator.apache.org > > === Subversion Directory === > http://svn.apache.org/repos

Re: Feedback on updated NOTICE and LICENSE files (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating)

On Dec 6, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Here's another one, say Apache TLP A includes works from Apache TLP B, > is this (B) a "third-party" work or not? Are the "parties" in this > case singular "the ASF" or the TLPs? Specifically, do I need to > include the NOTICE file from B in the

Re: Feedback on updated NOTICE and LICENSE files (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating)

On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:45 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> Personally I don't believe whirr is in error. Voldemort is under >> Apache 2.0 license, and as such falls under this: >> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-no

Re: Feedback on updated NOTICE and LICENSE files (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating)

On Dec 2, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > So I hope it's clear why it's frustrating to > have this rule suddenly pop up when it's apparently not enforced in > the majority of cases (and then to be asked to go and open JIRAs for > each of these projects on top of it). This requirement is f

[RESULT][IP CLEARANCE] Apache Geronimo 2.2 Dependency Upgrades

Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete. Thanks! --kevan On Nov 29, 2011, at 5:09 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: >> The Apache Geronimo project has received a contribution which updates a

Re: Feedback on updated NOTICE and LICENSE files (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating)

On Dec 1, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote: >>> As it stands, either the NOTICE file is wrong, or the LICENSE file is > wrong, because the NOTICE file should not mention 3rd party products > that are not in the LICENSE file. > > Thanks for the feedback! As I have already mentioned, we are

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating

On Nov 28, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote: > Thanks for the feedback, I still have some questions. > > 1. Alan, this nunit license acknowledgement is missing from the NOTICE file > since RC1 and RC1 had the nunit files. Since cutting RCs is a significant > time investment, we'd appreciat

[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Geronimo 2.2 Dependency Upgrades

The Apache Geronimo project has received a contribution which updates a number of Geronimo dependencies and associated code updates. The code contributions have been attached to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6217 I've committed the IP Clearance form to the Incubator website --

Re: Actively retiring projects (was: Incubator Board Report November 2011)

On Nov 20, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > >> Maybe I've had been using a high bar with the podlings I >> mentor/participate. I'll look into graduating couple podlings after I >> come back from Thanks Giving : Apache PhotArk, Ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating

I took a look at the svn source and the binary artifact and have some additional comments. 1) Your svn contains a number of jar files. I don't believe that the LICENSE/NOTICE file properly reflects the license/notice requirements of these jar files. 2) Why are these jars being stored in your s

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating

On Nov 17, 2011, at 2:10 PM, sebb wrote: > On 17 November 2011 16:30, Jun Rao wrote: >> Sebb, >> >> Just to want to clarify on the source distribution. It seems there are >> other Apache projects that release a single distribution with both source >> code and jars. For example, >> http://mirror

Re: October 2011 Incubator Board Report

On Oct 24, 2011, at 8:37 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 25/10/2011, at 9:02 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > >> With respect ot an early version of the report, there was confusion as to >> which podlings needed to report this month, but we appear to have it >> straightened out. The Wiki page had a

Re: Podlings needing copyright sign-off

On Aug 21, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Etch and Tashi are signed off. > > Droids (seems the easiest one to sign off on) and Olio (likely to be > retired) left from 2008 inductees. > > 2009 list remains unchanged from below. Wink is on my ToDo list. Just need a bit of free time...

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

On Jul 7, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:32:37 AM Karl Wright wrote: >> OK - so now I'm getting conflicting advice. Somebody went through a >> fair bit of effort to implement the geronimo versions of all these >> packages, including saaj-impl. Are you saying

Re: [VOTE] Retire Stonehenge

+1 (binding). --kevan On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > The Stonehenge project pretty much accomplished what it originally set out to > do and then really didn't find a way to transition to something that is > longer > lasting and able to develop a community around it.

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

On Jun 10, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down, > I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache > Incubator project. > > At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.

[RESULT][VOTE] Retire the Imperius Podling

er the next few days. --kevan On May 10, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > The Imperius podling has voted to retire/suspend/terminate/dormantify the > Imperius podling. I'm now bringing the vote to the incubator pmc. > > The vote was unanimous with 6 +1 votes (kevan mil

[VOTE] Retire the Imperius Podling

The Imperius podling has voted to retire/suspend/terminate/dormantify the Imperius podling. I'm now bringing the vote to the incubator pmc. The vote was unanimous with 6 +1 votes (kevan miller, david wood, mark carlson, neeraj joshi, david kaminsky, and craig russell). From the original

Fwd: [VOTE] Retire the Imperius Podling

FYI. A vote has been started on the Imperius dev list to retire the Imperius podling. --kevan Begin forwarded message: > From: Kevan Miller > Date: May 5, 2011 9:25:10 PM EDT > To: imperius-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Retire the Imperius Podling > > All, &

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1.3-incubating (RC1)

Hi Luciano, Signatures, checksums, source, license/notice, and build all look good. Here's my +1 --kevan On Apr 18, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > The Wink community has completed a vote on it's 1.1.3 release > (1.1.3-incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval to publish > th

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating RC2

On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > 72 hours has passed. > > Should I re-open vote? Hi Edward, 72 hours is the normal waiting time for a vote. Many votes run for a longer period of time. There's no need to re-open a vote. FYI, I never received your original vote email. Not su

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.2.1 - voting based on RC2

Here's my +1 Signature/checksum, license/notice, RAT, and general snooping about -- all look good. --kevan On Apr 4, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Josh Thompson wrote: > Incubator PMC, > > We just had a vote based on RC1 but found a bug in it. So, this is a new > vote > based on RC2. This email is pr

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.2.1

Hi Josh, Appreciate the bump... Looks really good. Nice job! One question -- what is the license for the .css files under web/themes/default/css/dojo/? I'm assuming they are AFL? Not clear from the information in the LICENSE file. Aside from the above, I'm +1 --kevan On Mar 29, 2011, at 11:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Howl as an Incubator Project

On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:55 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > +1 > > However there might be a name conflict with the Howl transaction log over at > object web here: > > http://howl.ow2.org/ > > Originally from the title, I immediately thought the > proposal was for OW's HOWL impl

Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC1)

Hi Luciano, Apologies for the slow review... Things look good, except for one problem, I think... Source, sigs/checksums, and build all look good. I don't like the licensing information in photark-webapp-M3-incubating.war First, note how there are redundant license files in WEB-INF/classes/LICE

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

+1 (binding) --kevan On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Dan Peterson wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator. > > The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal > (for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below) >

Re: [VOTE] Aries Graduation to TLP

+1 --kevan On Nov 22, 2010, at 6:51 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > Hi IPMCers and Incubator community, > > The Aries community has been discussing graduation and we feel we are > ready to graduate to a new TLP [1]. We subsequently voted [2]. As a > commnunity we were unanimous in deciding to graduat

Re: Dormant projects to mothball? (was missing reports ...)

On Nov 15, 2010, at 9:16 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > - VCL appears to be active, with no reason for the lack of a report. Correct. I didn't find an incubator notice/reminder that had been mailed to the project list. So, it's possible that they didn't get a reminder. I did ping their list ove

Re: Missing reports: DeltaCloud, Droids, HISE, ISIS, Kitty, Lucy, Stonehenge, VCL, Wookie

On Nov 15, 2010, at 3:03 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > All of these reports are missing and need to be posted IMMEDIATELY! I could swear that I added a report for Kitty, yesterday. Was extremely light -- as the podling is just getting set up. No real news to report, yet. --kevan ---

Re: [VOTE] Apache SIS 0.1-incubating Release Candidate #3

+1. Source, sigs/checksums, build -- all look good. Thanks Chris! --kevan On Nov 11, 2010, at 10:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I have posted a 3rd candidate for the Apache SIS 0.1-incubating release. The > source code is at: > > http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apach

Re: [VOTE] Apache SIS 0.1-incubating Release Candidate #1

On Nov 10, 2010, at 7:14 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > just figured that Apache SIS != Apache Isis > > First thought Chris mistyped it while releasing ... ;) > > A few notes: > > You should upgrade to apache-parent-7. You currently don't seem to have an > automated rat check in your build. Runni

Re: Mystery fax received

On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > Hi, > > We received an empty two page fax with this identifying information: > > 28/10/2010 08:42 01962816898 > > If you know of anyone who is trying to send us a document please ask them to > retransmit. I expect that this is from the A

Re: Ready to Graduate?

On Oct 18, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Please evaluate the status of your project with respect to graduation. Why, > for example, are Thrift and JSPWiki not yet ready to fly? What about Ace? > Others? FYI, the Aries project is actively discussing graduation. The Wink project di

Re: [VOTE] Kitty to Enter the Incubator

On Sep 29, 2010, at 3:24 PM, matt...@matthewsacks.com wrote: > Hi List, > I would like to do a quick sanity check on this thread. > Please correct me if I am wrong, but we have 2 binding PMC votes, 2 new > contributors (Rainer Jung and Senaka Fernando) and 1 new mentor (Kevan >

Re: [VOTE] Kitty to Enter the Incubator

On Sep 15, 2010, at 3:20 AM, msacks wrote: > At the advisement of the list, we have created a brand-new thread here > for voting on the kitty proposal. > The wiki page is located at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KittyProposal +1 IIUC, You currently have 2 mentors. You can sign me up as a 3r

Re: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC

+1 --kevan On Aug 18, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Now that the board has declared there are no legal > obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to > restart the vote. > > Thanks for your patience and consideration. > > > > - Original Message >> From: Joe Schaefer >> To

Re: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP

On Aug 17, 2010, at 5:09 PM, David Jencks wrote: > Dunno if it's exactly documentation but see this from Roy Fielding > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732740#action_12732740 > > Based on

Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.2-incubating RC2

+1 Signature/checksums, build, source (RAT), and general snooping around with emacs all looked good. Thanks Donald! --kevan On Aug 13, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > A Bean Validation 0.2-incubating release candidate #2 has been created > with the following artifacts up for a vote: >

Re: an experiment

On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Presumably there was no valid basis for the -1? Sucks, but Joe's proposal > doesn't change the fact that any PMC Member can still vote on any project. > The ASF does not have subprojects, there is only one PMC. We have gone > through this wi

Re: REMINDER: Reports due *NOW* -- HISE and SIS, where are you?

On Aug 16, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hey Noel, > > I uploaded an SIS report just now on the wiki. Any SIS mentors lurking > around, please check it out and sign off. Thanks! Done. Thanks Chris. --kevan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bean Validation 0.2-incubating

Hi Donald, -1. A build of the source distribution fails because of a RAT check. The source distribution contains a DEPENDENCIES file (which is not in SVN). If I remove the DEPENDENCIES file, the build succeeds. Signature/checksums, source, and general snooping -- all look good. So, once the bu

Re: VOTE: Release Apache RAT 0.7

+1 (binding) Checked Signature/checksums, build, source, and general snooping around. All looked good. --kevan On Aug 5, 2010, at 7:05 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Hi, > > the RAT developer team would like your approvement for a release of > Apache RAT 0.7. > > The distribution files (binar

Re: Graduated projects please tidy up

On May 24, 2010, at 8:58 PM, David Crossley wrote: > The following are listed this month: > abdera buildr log4php openwebbeans subversion trafficserver uima Thanks David. OpenWebBeans should be clear, now. I just removed Incubator distribution. --kevan ---

Re: [VOTE] Deltacloud Project

+1 (binding) --kevan On May 12, 2010, at 8:45 PM, David Lutterkort wrote: > Hi all, > > after the discussion so far [1], I'd like to put Detlacloud for a vote > for acceptance into the Apache Incubator according to the proposal[2] > > I _think_ I've added everybody who expressed interest in bein

Re: [VOTE] Accept Whirr for Incubation

+1 --kevan On May 5, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Tom White wrote: > We've added three mentors since starting the proposal thread, so I > would like to start the vote to accept Whirr into the Apache > Incubator. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhirrPro

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

+1 (binding) --kevan On May 4, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling. The goal is to build a community > around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and > i

Re: Question on tlps using incubator releases

On Mar 23, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Patrick Hunt wrote: >> Are there any issues with Apache tlps using incubator releases? I've heard, >> but cannot find any official documentation, that tlps should not. Is this >> really the case? Are there any rules/guidelines for this? > > I

Re: Third party Maven Repository Usage

On Mar 20, 2010, at 4:45 PM, Brian Fox wrote: > At the Central repository we are restricting the inclusion of external > repositories because this generally creates a mess. This is being > enforced on new artifacts coming in so I would recommend you do not > add them or your artifacts themselves

Re: [VOTE] - Graduate Log4PHP as a subproject of Logging project

+1 --kevan On Mar 4, 2010, at 4:18 AM, Gav... wrote: > Hi All, > > The Log4PHP community has voted [1] with 5 +1 votes and no other votes as > follows, to graduate to become a sub-project of the Logging Project. > > * Gavin McDonald > * Christian Hammers > * Jim Jagielski > * Jesus Christian (

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

On Feb 26, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > > On 26 Feb 2010, at 19:01, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On Feb 23, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Nick Kew wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:51:35 -0500 >>> Donald Woods wrote: >>> >>&

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

On Feb 23, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:51:35 -0500 > Donald Woods wrote: > >> I'm open to suggestions BeanValidation, OpenValidation, Validera, ... > > Any of those work for me, though OpenValidation has a hint of the > same problem. BeanValidation might be

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

On Feb 24, 2010, at 8:55 AM, James Carman wrote: > Sorry, didn't read the proposal very closely. The idea was that it > would be brought into Commons Validator and become the 2.x codebase. > I like that idea and I would think it would be wise to go through the > incubator to make sure the codeba

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > +1 to accept Validation into the Incubator > > afterwards we still can see where it actually ends up > > however I for sure want to see this at Apache. > > If you guys need a champion or mentor, count me in !! We have 3 mentors. If y

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

> o validation-user > o validation-commits >* Subversion directory > o https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/validation >* Website > o Confluence (VALIDATION) >* Issue Tracking > o JIRA (VALIDATION) > > In

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

"[PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation". I think the following sums up where we landed on that issue (at least it pretty well sums up where I landed on the issue): On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:55 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Kevan Miller wrote: > >> I think

Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Donald Woods wrote: > Thanks. I'll get with Kevan to update the proposal before we finally > submit it for a vote. Oops. Donald, we never synced up. My fault. Let's get this moving along. IMO, we should structure the project as a normal incubator project, use inc

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Spatial Information Systems Proposal

On Feb 17, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > I'll mentor the damned thing if nobody else will. Maybe I'll > learn something from Ian since he was so successful with cassandra. I'd been considering helping out mentoring, also. Sounds like we have a preferred minimum of 3, but I'm interes

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Spatial Information Systems Proposal

+1 --kevan On Feb 16, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Given the lack of response on the proposal, I'll assume lazy consensus and > call a vote. > > I'd like to propose incubation for a new project called the Spatial > Information Systems (SIS). I think we have all the > necessary bit

Re: [VOTE] Subversion podling for graduation

+1 (binding). Good luck. --kevan On Feb 11, 2010, at 11:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Hello all, > > I started a discussion thread a week-ish ago to seek out issues for > Subversion's graduation. The couple bits that were raised[1] have been > handled, I believe. So with that said, I am unaware of a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache libcloud 0.2.0

Here's my +1 (binding). Reviewed source and rat output. I didn't do any testing. One minor note: the copyright year in the notice file is 2009. --kevan On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:30 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > The Apache Libcloud project is currently voting on our first release, > 0.2.0. As required b

Re: Discussion: graduating Subversion

On Jan 25, 2010, at 3:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Hi all, > > Before calling for a vote to graduate Subversion, I figured it prudent > to have a discussion first. I believe Subversion is quite ready (and > has been, but the holidays and whatnot kept me from sending this > earlier). > > Any thoug

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Cassandra to an Apache TLP

+1 (binding) Good luck. --kevan On Jan 28, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > Greetings, > > We took the feedback from the earlier discussion[1] here and added our > active mentors to the proposed PMC, (for a total of 7 people), then ran > that through a new community vote[2]. > > [1] h

  1   2   3   >