On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thilo Goetz wrote:
> > > 3) IMO its better if the jars include the version number - which they
> > > do for the maven repo, but not the ones in the binary distro
> > >
> >
> > I personally agree with you, but we had a long
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sebb wrote:
> > > Problem building uimaj:
> > >
> > > 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> > >
>
> Unfortunately only the POM and metadata are present in
On 3/29/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please let us know. I'll keep a watch out for speeding up the review and voting.
thanks,
dims
On 3/29/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ken,
>
> > The UIMA podling has a fairly serious problem that was inadvertently
> > intr
On 3/18/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So the problem is
when a single company provides resources for a given
project. In such a case, other committers usually come from
the user community and this takes time. I think that
one of the goal of the podling should be to build a user
The Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating release vote is now closed. Here is
the summary:
+1 Votes
-
Jean Anderson (binding)
Ken Coar (binding)
Sam Ruby (binding)
Thilo Goetz
0 Votes: None
-1 Votes: None
My understanding is that this vote has passed and we can proceed with
announcing our
After correcting some issues in our last release candidate (thanks to
Jean Anderson for finding these), the Apache UIMA community has again
voted to release version
2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
approve this release.
The issues that were corrected since the last
On 3/6/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hola podlings,
This month's ASF Board reports should be written up on the wiki at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2007, like, now ;)
OpenEJB, kudos for being ahead of the game ;)
ActiveMQ, Trinidad, ODE, NMaven, River, UIMA, Wicket, plea
On 2/25/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A quick look reveals:
1) The jars don't have the incubator disclaimer in them. (this is the
critical one)
2) The for jVinci doesn't have "Apache UIMA" in it.
3) The poms don't have a licenses section
4) The tag doesn't have a url to apache.o
On 2/25/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A quick look through this looks OK to me for the src and bin distributions.
HOWEVER, I notice you are using Maven for builds. Is UIMA planning on
releasing the 2.1.0-incubating artifacts to the maven repository so other
maven based projects c
The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
approve this release.
Release artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
The release was signed by Thilo Goetz, our release manager. His
public key is
OK, it appears that my suggestion to rename was misguided. I am happy
to keep the UIMA name as well.
-Adam
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
+1 for UIMA, even if some other ones are cute.
Keeping UIMA makes it easy (for me) to pull just relevant pages from Google,
Technorati, Simpy, etc. instead of al
Hi everyone,
First a quick introduction: I am one of the original UIMA developers
and am listed as an initial committer on our proposal.
We've been trying to think up a more fun, non-acronym name for UIMA that
fits in better with the spirit of the ASF. It probably makes sense to
do this no
12 matches
Mail list logo
