On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Can you update your podling status page to link to your podling name search
done.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands
+1 binding
On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 5:10:50 PM Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> I small comment: we don't do users@ list of podlings, do we? If so
> samoa-users@googlegroups --> us...@samoa.incubator.apache.org
> will need to be converged into dev@.
>
>
Not all podlings use a users@,
Can you update your podling status page to link to your podling name search
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-46
John
On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 8:10:03 PM Jakob Homan wrote:
> The Samza podling community has voted to graduate from the Incubator.
>
> The vote passed with 17 +
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept SAMOA as a
> new Incubator project.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept SAMOA into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of SAMOA
> [ ] -1 Do not accept SAMOA because ..
On 12 December 2014 at 01:07, Jakob Homan wrote:
> The Samza podling community has voted to graduate from the Incubator.
>
> The vote passed with 17 +1s and no -1s or +/-0s.
>
> Binding +1s x 10 : Jakob, Chinmay, Yan, Chris Riccomini, Sriram,
> Zhijie, Martin, Roman, Garry, Chris Douglas
> Non-bin
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> I small comment: we don't do users@ list of podlings, do we? If so
> samoa-users@googlegroups --> us...@samoa.incubator.apache.org
> will need to be converged into dev@.
>
> Cos
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 a
The Samza podling community has voted to graduate from the Incubator.
The vote passed with 17 +1s and no -1s or +/-0s.
Binding +1s x 10 : Jakob, Chinmay, Yan, Chris Riccomini, Sriram,
Zhijie, Martin, Roman, Garry, Chris Douglas
Non-binding +1s x 7: Claudio, TJ, Robert, Roger, Danny, Jon, Yi
Link
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:12PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
> See my overlapping mail. I don’t think anyone is questioning your
> recommendation. Just that an explicit statement to the community is
I wasn't thinking that, Ross :) Just added a data point from mentor's angle.
While I am not
See my overlapping mail. I don’t think anyone is questioning your
recommendation. Just that an explicit statement to the community is necessary.
In my experience this sometimes makes things happen - when it does it usually
starts with "really? I didn't realize it was that bad. How can I help"
T
That's all good and I'm certainly not suggesting it’s the wrong thing to do
(nor do I believe that was Bertrands opinion - he did say "for now").
It's just that it should be a decision of the podling, not the IPMC. If the
podling doesn't agree then the IPMC might decide to go ahead anyway.
Than
+1 (binding).
I small comment: we don't do users@ list of podlings, do we? If so
samoa-users@googlegroups --> us...@samoa.incubator.apache.org
will need to be converged into dev@.
Cos
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:02AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to a
Actually, as per this email http://is.gd/55HOkJ I have emailed npanday-dev@
with the reminder about missing report.
And I have raised the flag about project's issues on the general@ before. As
far as I can tell this whole discussion about NPanday is going on for about a
year now (by very modest e
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> Mentors should raise the issue with the podling. If the mentors are absent
> then maybe the problem
> doesn't lie with the podling but with our handling of it.
The only active mentors left on the project seem to be of an
opini
Mentors should raise the issue with the podling. If the mentors are absent then
maybe the problem doesn't lie with the podling but with our handling of it.
A VOTE should be a formality used on the few occasions where our bye-laws
require them. It certainly should not, IMHO, be a stick to wave in
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
>> for the NPanday poddling...
>
> -1 for now.
>
> Unless I missed something I don't see any mention of this on the
> NPand
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept SAMOA as a
> new Incubator project.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept SAMOA into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of SAMOA
> [ ] -1 Do not accept SAMOA because ...
+1 (binding)
+1 (non-binding)
I’d be happy to help if SAMOA needs anything from the Storm project.
-Taylor
On Dec 11, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept SAMOA as a
> new Incubator project.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept SAMOA into the Incubator
> [ ] +0
+1 (binding)
Enis
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> - Henry
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> > Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept SAMOA as a
> > new Incubator project.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept SAMOA int
+1 (binding)
- Henry
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept SAMOA as a
> new Incubator project.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept SAMOA into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of SAMOA
> [ ] -1 Do not accept SAMOA b
Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept SAMOA as a
new Incubator project.
[ ] +1 Accept SAMOA into the Incubator
[ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of SAMOA
[ ] -1 Do not accept SAMOA because ...
The vote will be open for at least 72h and closes at the earliest on Dec 14
Wow - thanks for your diligence Bertrand. I support this -1 unless Bertrand
made a mistake.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:02 AM
To: Incubator General
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Recommend retirement for NPan
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
> for the NPanday poddling...
-1 for now.
Unless I missed something I don't see any mention of this on the
NPanday mailing list at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-npa
22 matches
Mail list logo
