On 26.08.2014 00:24, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This strikes me very similar to providing access to daily SNAPSHOT binary
>> artifacts. I would argue that labeling it appropriately is all you
>> need.
> Except that is this case the intended audience of the application is users.
Bloodhound has
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This strikes me very similar to providing access to daily SNAPSHOT binary
>> artifacts. I would argue that labeling it appropriately is all you
>> need.
> Except that is this case the intended audience of the application is users.
I
Hi,
> Are you addressing me personally or Roman or the incubator in general?
Was sent to general@ so the content of them is for the incubator in general,
the emails were not personally addressed. But if it helps my second email was
to clarify / add to Roman's comments.
Thanks,
Justin
-
Try out my scripts - they take on that precise philosophy and try to make sense
of what is already there
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 25, 2014, at 3:54 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> I've been too busy to do more than lurk occasionally. Consequently I am not
> mentoring and not sheph
Hi -
I've been too busy to do more than lurk occasionally. Consequently I am not
mentoring and not shepherding lately.
I do want to add something to this debate. PMCs write their board reports to
the board in whatever way they want. The Incubator is about teaching PPMCs how
to become PMCs. We
Hi Justin,
Are you addressing me personally or Roman or the incubator in general?
-Alex
On 8/25/14 3:21 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The whole point point of the release process is to:
>1. Have legal overview by the PMC
>2. Engage and involve the community
>
>Why would we want to avoid e
Hi,
> This strikes me very similar to providing access to daily SNAPSHOT binary
> artifacts. I would argue that labeling it appropriately is all you
> need.
Except that is this case the intended audience of the application is users.
> After all, if you're pushing updates it means that something t
Hi,
The whole point point of the release process is to:
1. Have legal overview by the PMC
2. Engage and involve the community
Why would we want to avoid either? As [1] says "Under no circumstances are
unapproved builds a substitute for releases. If this policy seems inconvenient,
then release m
I have received more information from the grantor and updated the review
package.
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/flex-radii8.html
The review URL is the same. I removed the old zip of sources and replaced
it with the updated package. The updated package has a "2" on the end of
its file
Cancelling. Preparing new review based on feedback on this thread.
New lazy vote thread out soon.
On 8/22/14 4:28 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi
>
> 2) Regarding icons. The icons in question are common and trivial
>(">"
> and ">>" for 'more' and 'lots more', down arrow, etc).
>
>G
On 25/08/2014 jan i wrote:
I am amazed how many ways my name can be spelled.
That happens more often if you don't use your full name when signing or
in the mail sender... But I'm looking forward to seeing the next
variant! (and sorry for the off-topic)
Regards,
Andrea.
--
On 08/23/2014 05:10 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi!
I was hoping that other mentors (who were explicitly CCed)
would reply, but apparently Richard is the last mentor standing.
Although we can wait for a week or so more (after all, vacations
are in full swing right now) I think it is time for me
On 25 August 2014 19:26, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just want to point out that lack of activity may mean lack of issues
> that need dealing with not that a mentor gone awol.
>
> Right. And that's why technical side of thing
On 25 August 2014 20:21, Julian Hyde wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:07 AM, jan i wrote:
>
> > On 25 August 2014 19:25, Julian Hyde wrote:
> >
> >> +1 Jan Inversion
> >>
> > I wonder who that is ?
> >
> > Politely said, I am amazed how many ways my name can be spelled.
>
> Sorry; over-enthusias
On 25 August 2014 20:17, Julian Hyde wrote:
> A few issues were raised during the vote for Apache Optiq 0.9.0
> (incubating) [0]. I started a separate thread to avoid muddying the vote. I
> address them below.
>
thanks, see my comments below.
>
> On Aug 23, 2014, at 10:36 AM, jan i wrote:
>
>
On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:07 AM, jan i wrote:
> On 25 August 2014 19:25, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
>> +1 Jan Inversion
>>
> I wonder who that is ?
>
> Politely said, I am amazed how many ways my name can be spelled.
Sorry; over-enthusiastic spell-checker.
Julian
---
A few issues were raised during the vote for Apache Optiq 0.9.0 (incubating)
[0]. I started a separate thread to avoid muddying the vote. I address them
below.
On Aug 23, 2014, at 10:36 AM, jan i wrote:
> I am a bit concerned about the xml files. suppressions.xml references:
> "-//Pupp
On 25 August 2014 19:25, Julian Hyde wrote:
> This vote passes with 6 +1s and no 0 or -1 votes:
> +1 Alan Gates (mentor)
> +1 Jan Inversion
>
I wonder who that is ?
Politely said, I am amazed how many ways my name can be spelled.
rgds
jan Iversen.
> +1 John D. Ament
> +1 Justin Mclean
> +1 S
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just want to point out that lack of activity may mean lack of issues that
> need dealing with not that a mentor gone awol.
Right. And that's why technical side of things (like YAMLizing report, etc.) is
a prerequisite for enabling
This vote passes with 6 +1s and no 0 or -1 votes:
+1 Alan Gates (mentor)
+1 Jan Inversion
+1 John D. Ament
+1 Justin Mclean
+1 Steven Noels (mentor)
+1 Ashutosh Chauhan (champion)
There was some feedback during voting (most of which I agree with). I shall
open a separate thread to discuss.
Thank
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi Incubator Folks,
>
> My understanding is that changes to a website like flex.a.o don't require
> a release vote, even though one could consider and html file pushed to the
> site as publishing source beyond the group that owns it.
>
> But wha
Hi Incubator Folks,
My understanding is that changes to a website like flex.a.o don't require
a release vote, even though one could consider and html file pushed to the
site as publishing source beyond the group that owns it.
But what about web apps? Apache Flex is designed for creating web apps
Hi,
Just want to point out that lack of activity may mean lack of issues that need
dealing with not that a mentor gone awol.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional comma
23 matches
Mail list logo
