Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Gurkan Erdogdu
> >
> > This is the vote result for the OpenWebBeans proposal;
> >
> > * Matt Hogstrom +1 (binding)
> > * Martijn Dashorst +1 (binding)
> > * Niclas Hedhman +1 (binding)
> > * Kevan Miller+1 (binding-mentor)
> > * Niall Pemberton
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Related to this, perhaps our labeling of 'incubating' is not effective.
>
> Why not just call all releases from incubator 'alpha'?
>
> The 'incubating' tag doesn't seem to set expectations correctly in the wider
> open sourc
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi;
>
> This is the vote result for the OpenWebBeans proposal;
>
> * Matt Hogstrom +1 (binding)
> * Martijn Dashorst +1 (binding)
> * Niclas Hedhman +1 (binding)
> * Kevan Miller+1 (binding-me
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Do we want users to have easy access to these releases, or to make
it difficult? Users need to know about the fact that Apache does not
yet vouch for the community behind these releases. How do
Hi;
This is the vote result for the OpenWebBeans proposal;
* Matt Hogstrom +1 (binding)
* Martijn Dashorst +1 (binding)
* Niclas Hedhman +1 (binding)
* Kevan Miller+1 (binding-mentor)
* Niall Pemberton +1 (binding)
* Craig L Russell+1 (binding)
* Niklas
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 11:34 +1100, David Crossley wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > David Crossley wrote:
> > ...
> > > You need to do the "Acceptance" steps. I added you to the
> > > "Reporting Schedule" a while ago. The next step is to
> > > add your "Status page". There are links to the rele
The status page template includes a bullet item that states, in part:
"check www.nameprotect.com to be sure that the name is not already
trademarked for an existing software product"
How do we go about this? The CSC web site wants me to call them to have an
account set up, but surely we're not al
