On 3/5/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for #3, I can use some more comment. The current header reflect what's
found in the Java Lucene source code such that any place Java Lucene uses
the newer header (http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers) so
is Apache Lucene.Net.
Hi Dan and all,
Many thanks to everyone who took the time to review this release and comment
on it. Much appreciated.
I have completed #2, and #4 -- those are now committed into SVN.
I am working on #1 trying to figure it out. This is my first time, so there
is a lot form me to look over and f
Adam,
On Monday 05 March 2007 13:27, Adam Lally wrote:
> Is it sufficient for 3 and 4 to add this information only to our
> top-level "uimaj" pom, which is the parent of our other poms? And is
> this correct information to add:
>
>
> The Apache Softwar
Hi,
I read in the documentation that this FTP server supports implicit SSL
connections. However, when I dowload the snapshot the configuration files
does not look the same as in the configuration. Does it still support
implicit SSL?
I tried to setup explicit SSL with the test keystore but I didn't
On 2/25/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A quick look reveals:
1) The jars don't have the incubator disclaimer in them. (this is the
critical one)
2) The for jVinci doesn't have "Apache UIMA" in it.
3) The poms don't have a licenses section
4) The tag doesn't have a url to apache.o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> You cannot call the LICENSE and NOTICE files LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
> (I know that it makes sense under Windows). The LICENSE refers
> explicitly to a NOTICE file not a NOTICE.txt. Just rename them to
> LICENSE and NOTICE as used in the rest of the ASF projects.
O
Marshall Schor wrote:
> While going thru some code and changing old-style Apache license headers
> to new style ones, a scan
> showed that the Apache license, itself, has a section near the bottom,
> where it says
>
> APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
>
> and then goes on to
While going thru some code and changing old-style Apache license headers
to new style ones, a scan
showed that the Apache license, itself, has a section near the bottom,
where it says
APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
and then goes on to show using the "old style" Apache
Thanks for your careful review, Jean, much appreciated.
We'll fix these issues and retry :-)
My understanding is that the Status page needs to be updated by an ASF
member - we're working
with our Mentors to get this done.
If anyone else has comments / issues, please let us know so we can fix
George,
On Sunday 04 March 2007 22:38, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> Many thanks for looking this over.
>
> For #1 & #2. Can you tell how to go about fixing them? How/where do I
> create/get those files?
For #1, there is a lot of information at:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.htm
George,
Its great to see Lucene.Net coming along in Apache. It's a tool that I
have used for quite some time, in various forms. There are quite a few
procedural things to get right when releasing software under the ASF. I
know it can feel quite daunting to tick all the boxes (I have had to go
thro
11 matches
Mail list logo
