George, On Sunday 04 March 2007 22:38, George Aroush wrote: > Hi Dan, > Many thanks for looking this over. > > For #1 & #2. Can you tell how to go about fixing them? How/where do I > create/get those files?
For #1, there is a lot of information at: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html Reading through that all can be a bit daunting, but there's a LOT of very good information about GPG and encryption and keys and stuff there. For #2, you just need a DISCLAIMER file in root that says something like: ----------- Apache Lucene.NET is an effort undergoing incubation at the Apache Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator PMC. Incubation is required of all newly accepted projects until a further review indicates that the infrastructure, communications, and decision making process have stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF. ------------ > For #3, those are the same header as used by the Java Lucene 2.0 > release. The port from Java to C# caries over the same headers, etc. See: ttp://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html I hope that helps. Dan > For #4, I agree. > > All: This is my first release, so if you find issues, please try to be > specific. > > Regards, > > -- George Aroush > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 10:02 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: George Aroush > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build > 003 incubating > > > -1 (non-binding) > > > After a very quick perusal: > 1) Missing gpg signatures on the files. > > 2) No incubator disclaimer anywhere. > > 3) All the files have the "old style" Apache header. They should have > been updated to the new style. The copyright dates in the old headers > are obviously not updated (most say 2004) which is one good reason to > change to the new version that doesn't have it. > > 4) The readme's and such just say "Lucene". They should be clear that > it's "Apache Lucene". > > > Dan > > On Sunday 04 March 2007 19:29, George Aroush wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Lucene.Net community has voted to release Lucene.Net 2.0 build 003 > > incubating. I am emailing you to request your vote for this release. > > > > (For those who are not familiar with Lucene.Net, please visit > > http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ to learn more.) > > > > Below are the release details. > > > > Release history: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/C%23/src/H > >IS TORY .txt > > > > Release artifact (source & binary): > > http://people.apache.org/~aroush/Lucene.Net-2.0-003/ > > > > Release vote history on Lucene.Net mailing list: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-lucene-net-dev/2007 > >02 .mbo x/[EMAIL PROTECTED] and > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-lucene-net-user/200 > >70 2.mb ox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I'm asking for your vote to approve this release. > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache Lucene.Net 2.0.0 build 003 > > incubating [ ] -1 Veto this release (explain why so it can be > > addressed) > > > > Regards, > > > > -- George Aroush > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
