Adam,
On Monday 05 March 2007 13:27, Adam Lally wrote:
> Is it sufficient for 3 and 4 to add this information only to our
> top-level "uimaj" pom, which is the parent of our other poms? And is
> this correct information to add:
> <licenses>
> <license>
> <name>The Apache Software License, Version 2.0</name>
>
> <url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
> <distribution>repo</distribution>
> </license>
> </licenses>
> <organization>
> <name>The Apache Software Foundation</name>
> <url>http://www.apache.org/</url>
> </organization>
That would be fine. The alternative would be to set the "parent" of your
parent to be:
<parent>
<groupId>org.apache</groupId>
<artifactId>apache</artifactId>
<version>4</version>
</parent>
(version 4 was just released, may not have hit all the mirrors yet)
Your parent pom would then inherit the licenses and organization sections
from there.
Dan
>
> I'm assuming <distribution>repo</distribution> doesn't actually
> obligate us to put anything in the ASF incubating repository
> unless/until we decide we want to. That decision hasn't been made
> yet, but writing the pom this way would leave our options open.
>
> Thanks,
> -Adam
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
