Leo Simons wrote:
>
> > This is the RELEASE NOTES for God's sake! Do you really
> > think that a document that details the release notes
> > for a codebase should not specify that the codebase
> > is in Incubation.
>
> For the record, I'm personally not too fussed. Those disclaimers end
> up in
The name would be "Apache Cayenne Project". Please fix before
submitting to the Board.
There is some stupid virus of a template showing these as "Apache Foo
PMC" which has to stop.
People should really look at actual resolutions that the Board
approves, not what gets sent in. We sometimes tweak
On Dec 1, 2006, at 5:22 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 1, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 01/12/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 30, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> What Jim pointed out was docs/release_notes.txt -- it should
probably include the in
On Dec 1, 2006, at 4:24 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
I am asking for a vote of the Incubator PMC on graduation of
Cayenne that is conditional on the board's approval of a TLP for
that purpose. Please cast your votes.
+1.
Good luck!
- Leo
Here's my +1 on this list.
-jean
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Apache Cayenne community just voted to request graduation from the
> Incubator as a TLP [1]. The text of the proposed board resolution
> (adopted from iBatis graduation resolution) is included below. Other
> project related links are al
Perfect. With this an Dan Kulp's changes let's reroll.
On Dec 1, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
Hi there,
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 08:17:36AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[...]
There is NOTHING in the release_notes file that
indicates that CXF is in incubation.
I just committed an upd
+1 again from me :-)
TTFN,
-bd-
On Dec 1, 2006, at 8:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Apache Cayenne community just voted to request graduation from the
Incubator as a TLP [1]. The text of the proposed board resolution
(adopted from iBatis graduation resolution) is included below.
Other pro
Hi,
On 12/1/06, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 01 December 2006 10:10, Martin Ritchie wrote:
> So are we saying that having a DISCLAIMER file and the disclaimer in
> the README at the top level is not "clear" enough or does "all
> documentation" need to have the disclaimer as i
Hi there,
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 08:17:36AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> [...]
>
> There is NOTHING in the release_notes file that
> indicates that CXF is in incubation.
I just committed an update for the version of the release_notes.txt that
is in trunk. I just added under incubation, or (i
+1
2006/12/1, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1
Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have fixed all the issues that were raised during the earlier vote and
> I have uploaded the new release at: http://people.apache.org/~bravi
>
>
>
> Also, I used the tag
> https://svn.apache.org/r
This vote has passed with +1s from: Robert Burrell Donkin, Jukka Zitting
& Geir Magnusson Jr. There were no -1s.
Thank you all that took the time to help getting the Yoko M1 release
done.
- Balaji
Apache Yoko
-Original Message-
From: Mosur Ravi, Balaji
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 1
+1
Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote:
Hi,
I have fixed all the issues that were raised during the earlier vote and
I have uploaded the new release at: http://people.apache.org/~bravi
Also, I used the tag
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko/tags/yoko-1.0-incubating
-M1-release for th
On Dec 1, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 01/12/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 30, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>
> What Jim pointed out was docs/release_notes.txt -- it should
probably
> include the incubator disclaimer.
>
Yes. There is noth
Actually TLP was the plan from the beginning, the main reason being
that Cayenne was an existing open source project with a working
meritocratic self-management since the inception in 2001. In the ASF
structure this maps best to a TLP with its own PMC.
Also while we have a great working rel
Hi,
Cool. Can you please refresh my memory on why Cayenne wants to be a
TLP now, as opposed to a project under the DB PMC (its original
sponsor)?
Yoav
On 12/1/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apache Cayenne community just voted to request graduation from the
Incubator as a TLP [1
On Friday 01 December 2006 10:10, Martin Ritchie wrote:
> On 01/12/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 30, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> > > What Jim pointed out was docs/release_notes.txt -- it should probably
> > > include the incubator disclaimer.
> >
> > Yes. T
Apache Cayenne community just voted to request graduation from the
Incubator as a TLP [1]. The text of the proposed board resolution
(adopted from iBatis graduation resolution) is included below. Other
project related links are also shown below - [2], [3]. The following
people cast +1 votes
On 01/12/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 30, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>
> What Jim pointed out was docs/release_notes.txt -- it should probably
> include the incubator disclaimer.
>
Yes. There is nothing in that file to indicate incubation.
It's an importan
On Nov 30, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
What Jim pointed out was docs/release_notes.txt -- it should probably
include the incubator disclaimer.
Yes. There is nothing in that file to indicate incubation.
It's an important doc, so the fact of incubation
should be clear.
---
On Nov 30, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Nov 29, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote:
The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes
the
previous licensing issues. Builds have been published here:
Binaries and Source Distribution
I really like to join David Jones and thank all of you guys for your
help/support/reviews/remarks during this yearlong incubation.
This process has been a big challenge for the OFBiz community but I
think that has been also beneficial for improving the quality of the
project/community in gener
21 matches
Mail list logo
