On Dec 1, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 01/12/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 30, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>
> What Jim pointed out was docs/release_notes.txt -- it should
probably
> include the incubator disclaimer.
>
Yes. There is nothing in that file to indicate incubation.
It's an important doc, so the fact of incubation
should be clear.
From (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html):
Disclaimers
Podling web sites MUST include a clear disclaimer on their website and
in all documentation (including releases) stating that they are in
incubation. Podlings SHOULD use the following text for all
disclaimers:
---
So are we saying that having a DISCLAIMER file and the disclaimer in
the README at the top level is not "clear" enough or does "all
documentation" need to have the disclaimer as in all documentation
files?
Would be good to clear this up and update the Disclaimer section to
say exactly where the specified disclaimer text should be put.
This is the RELEASE NOTES for God's sake! Do you really
think that a document that details the release notes
for a codebase should not specify that the codebase
is in Incubation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
