Robert, thanks for hooking in.
I am wondering if there are so big concerns by the rest of the Incubator PMC
that there is no vote here.
Thanks,
Matthias
On 9/26/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Trinidad commun
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
[X] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason:
+1 (non binding)
We've made the move to the framework UIMA 6 months ago to be the middleware of
our new product version. This decision has been made after reading the very
comple
[X] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason:
-ehn
Ian Holsman wrote:
issues addressed in this release:
1. updated proposal included
2. The first paragraph explains it to a layperson
3. OASIS issue addressed
[ ] +1 Accept
On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 votes,
including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. The
proposal can be seen at
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
>
>> I wrote a set of pascal bindings for the Apache libraries. They are
>> intended primarely to write Apache modules in Pascal and is compatible
>> with various pascal compilers [and] many architectures.
>
>> The current stable version
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> I wrote a set of pascal bindings for the Apache libraries. They are
> intended primarely to write Apache modules in Pascal and is compatible
> with various pascal compilers [and] many architectures.
> The current stable version allows the creation of apache 2.
On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the advice Garrett and Guillaume. I read the policy stuff on
incubator releases in [1] and [2] but didn't see anything about using
private directories and not using official repositories.
We can use a private repository
On 9/27/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 3:10 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> it is very rare for a non-committer to act as release manager.
Yeah, I can't really remember ever seeing that.
i was involved with something reasonable similar a year or two ago.
fort
Thanks for the advice Garrett and Guillaume. I read the policy stuff on
incubator releases in [1] and [2] but didn't see anything about using
private directories and not using official repositories.
The way we have done the previous milestone releases is to upload the
archives to this location,
On Sep 27, 2006, at 3:10 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
it is very rare for a non-committer to act as release manager.
Yeah, I can't really remember ever seeing that. Of course, it happens
quite often that downstream repackagers aren't committers.
if the CXF community really want you to
yay.. congrats!
On 9/27/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks to those who voted on this release.
The vote passes with 3 +1's :
+1 James Strachan
+1 Robert Burrell Donkin
+1 Davanum Srinivas
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
-
Hello,
I wrote a set of pascal bindings for the Apache libraries. They are
intended primarely to write Apache modules in Pascal and is compatible
with various pascal compilers, such as Free Pascal, Borland Delphi and
GNU Pascal, and works on many architectures.
The current stable version allows
On 9/27/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bozhong Lin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I previously posted email on cxf-dev, I am very keen in contributing
> to CeltiXfire release management and other project management related
> stuff. From the Apache release process document [1], I am not sure what
>
In addition, I think the current policy is to
not put incubating artifacts in official repositories ...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 9/26/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
>> publish
>
On 9/26/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish
the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2].
Please vote by 1pm EST, Friday September 29th 2006.
[1] Proposal,
http://mail-archives.apache.org/m
There certainly is interest in Apache Harmony, as this is very much
aligned to what we've already been doing for the past year and a few
months.
geir
On Sep 27, 2006, at 5:09 AM, Chris Gray wrote:
Hello guys,
To introduce myself: I'm one of the original developers of the
Wonka embedded
Bozhong Lin wrote:
Hi,
As I previously posted email on cxf-dev, I am very keen in contributing
to CeltiXfire release management and other project management related
stuff. From the Apache release process document [1], I am not sure what
qualification/requirements it takes to get the release m
Hi,
As I previously posted email on cxf-dev, I am very keen in contributing
to CeltiXfire release management and other project management related
stuff. From the Apache release process document [1], I am not sure what
qualification/requirements it takes to get the release management job done:
+1 from me (Binding)
-- dims
On 9/27/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I checked it out, seems cleanly packaged, with incubation notice and licenses.
+1 from me.
Paul
On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Woden developer community has voted on and appr
+1
On Sep 26, 2006, at 7:17 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
issues addressed in this release:
1. updated proposal included
2. The first paragraph explains it to a layperson
3. OASIS issue addressed
[ ] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the fol
+1 (non binding)
On 9/27/06, Deepal jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1, indeed
Deepal
> I checked it out, seems cleanly packaged, with incubation notice and
> licenses.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Paul
>
> On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The Woden developer commu
+1, indeed
Deepal
> I checked it out, seems cleanly packaged, with incubation notice and
> licenses.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Paul
>
> On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal to
>> release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Miles
I checked it out, seems cleanly packaged, with incubation notice and licenses.
+1 from me.
Paul
On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 v
Thanks to those who voted on this release.
The vote passes with 3 +1's :
+1 James Strachan
+1 Robert Burrell Donkin
+1 Davanum Srinivas
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
25 matches
Mail list logo
