On Mar 29, 2005, at 6:58 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ted Leung wrote:
-1
I am surprised that people think the committer diversity
issues are not an issue for graduation.
Actually, I agree with you, and others have expressed the same concern,
although without casting a vote. Adding new Committers i
Ted Leung wrote:
> -1
> I am surprised that people think the committer diversity
> issues are not an issue for graduation.
Actually, I agree with you, and others have expressed the same concern,
although without casting a vote. Adding new Committers is probably the #1
issue facing the Derby pro
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Er, just a vote -- there is no veto for this type of decision.
Actually, althought it has never been necessary to address so far, I do
recall discussion of a -1 veto option graduation. Yes, it is a policy
decision, but it effects importing code under the auspices of the
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> the committer diversity issue has been raised as an issue by
> at least a couple folks. While it looks like they meet the
> requirement to have committers from at least three independent
> organizations (I believe Noel and Jeremy are the two who are
> independent from IBM)
Ted,
Thanks for the follow-up. Sounds as if there isn't as much of an
opportunity for a close connection as I'd thought.
Best of luck, and congrats. :-)
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
-1
I am surprised that people think the committer diversity issues are not
an issue for graduation.
As far as I can tell, the distribution of committers in Derby is worse
than either Xerces-J, or Xalan-J
both of which have been viewed negatively because of the number of
committers from a single
+1
I'd be happier to see it in DB as I think that can help build a strong
community there, but it's up to iBATIS peeps... I think we're going to
regret the large number of islands we're creating.
geir
On Mar 16, 2005, at 5:51 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
The iBATIS team has worked through the incubati
Hi All,
I'm not sure this is the correct place for asking this question, but I've got
to start somewhere.
For a few years I'm walking around with ideas to create a new email standard,
one that would make spam virtually impossible.
The idea is very simple, and technically it's not a real proble
+1 now that Jeremy has addressed Roy's concerns.
On Mar 28, 2005, at 1:51 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
As mentor, I feel comfortable proposing that Derby graduate from the
incubator and take up its place in the DB project. So I'd like
to start a formal vote
I've not been following the iBatis incubation closely (as they
expressed a preference to not go under DB, and, while I quite like
iBatis, only have so much time) but if they have a range of
sub-projects already, and a sufficient developer community, a TLP makes
sense from my perspective.
I thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Sorry, I'd like to vote for this, but someone was being cute
> and removed a lot of relevant questions from the template at
>
>http://incubator.apache.org/projects/derby.html
Actually, I don't think the above is the case at all; th
Thanks! I did try to check the -dev list, but couldn't find the
archives, sorry. When I re-posted the question to -dev as Noel
suggested, Salvatore explained the situation.
I figured you were aware of the issue and dealing with it, but just
wanted to bring it to your attention just in case.
--
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:41:18 -0500, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ted,
>
> It seems appropriate to graduate, but should iBATIS be a TLP, or go under
> db.apache.org, along with Derby and related Jakarta Commons code that has
> been moving, in your opinion?
>
> --- Noel
We di
13 matches
Mail list logo
