On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 22:37, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > > > I would propose those documents be changed to state that what is
> > > > outlined above is a prerequisite for entry into the incubator.
> > > -1.
>
> > So you can veto a vote I would propose to members I feel is in the best
> > interest o
> > > I would propose those documents be changed to state that what is
> > > outlined above is a prerequisite for entry into the incubator.
> > -1.
> So you can veto a vote I would propose to members I feel is in the best
> interest of preserving the integrity of the software here.
Where did you
> But since the need remains for a free gallery of common
> Web app icons (document, search, print, etc.), does anyone
> have a suggestion of where such a project would fit, or is
> anyone aware of an existing one?
The only place at Apache where I believe that this would make sense is
Apache Commo
I can almost guarantee that you could get hosted at sourceforge. Beyond
that i don't know of anyone providing hosting for that type of project.
-Brian
On Dec 8, 2003, at 9:32 PM, Jay Zylstra wrote:
I'll interpret the lack of response to mean this idea doesn't fit
Apache. Okay. But since the n
I'll interpret the lack of response to mean this idea doesn't fit
Apache. Okay. But since the need remains for a free gallery of common
Web app icons (document, search, print, etc.), does anyone have a
suggestion of where such a project would fit, or is anyone aware of an
existing one?
JayZ
---
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 20:43, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > I also don't think it's really that much work on the behalf of a
> > project
> > trying to enter Apache to do a little leg work in resolving that before
> > entering.
>
> I didn't say they shouldn't try -- I said it wasn't necessary.
> As fa
I also don't think it's really that much work on the behalf of a
project
trying to enter Apache to do a little leg work in resolving that before
entering.
I didn't say they shouldn't try -- I said it wasn't necessary.
As far as I am concerned, no existing project should be allowed
to create autono
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 18:07, Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> > There is no reason for a project to have a final destination until
> > it has to go somewhere other than incubator, at which point it can
> > decide whether it wants to be a TLP (calling for a bo
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> There is no reason for a project to have a final destination until
> it has to go somewhere other than incubator, at which point it can
> decide whether it wants to be a TLP (calling for a board vote) or
> part of an existing project (calling for that p
Jason van Zyl wrote:
What's going to happen with AltRMI and the FtpServer? They just sit in
the incubator indefinitely? There's no IP issues as these came from
within Apache anyway? If an incubated codebase has no slated home within
then I would ask how it even landed here in the first place?
Both
10 matches
Mail list logo
