> > > I would propose those documents be changed to state that what is
> > > outlined above is a prerequisite for entry into the incubator.
> > -1.
> So you can veto a vote I would propose to members I feel is in the best
> interest of preserving the integrity of the software here.
Where did you see a veto? A -1 is a veto on code, not P&P.
> I find it ridiculous that a body of code can land here
> with absolutely no direction.
I accept that as your view. I disagree with you, but I accept your opinion
as yours.
> In the past when the incubator didn't exist when new bodies of code came
> in they became entities like xml.apache.org, jakarta.apache.org or fell
> under one of those TLPs. Why should it be any different now?
For the reasons that brought the Incubator into existence.
> Apache shall simply become a directory of projects whereby the
> only requirement is successful incubation? If so I think that
> definitely requires a vote because as a member that's not what
> I see Apache being.
Well, first of all, successful incubation isn't nothing. It means that the
project *started* with a Member or Officer sponsoring it, and the Incubator
PMC voting to give it a chance. And then it was able to attract a
sustainable community, and operate according to Apache principles. But you
are implying that you have a particular vision for the ASF. What is that?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
