fucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=46DarYSqfwFwairpNQghctLv0_-3vtI5Yli0LHrV2CE&s=k4mhdfQkivJqO5O6mbuSNSYk2vW8dwUF7RKtiqWGSI4&e=>
.
Document: draft-hardy-pdf-mime-02
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 07/07/16
IETF LC End Date: 07/21/16
IESG Telechat date:9/1/16
Summary: Ready.
This informational document
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-mptcp-experience-06
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 9/6/16
IETF LC End Date: 9/13/16
IESG Telechat date: 9/15/16
Summary: Ready with issues
A very useful and well written document, which gathers implementation
and depl
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-07
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 10/16/16
IETF LC End Date: 10/17/16
IESG Telechat date: 10/27/16
Summary:
Ready
The document describes how a stateful PCE can be used to solve
various proble
see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-14
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 10/26/16
IETF LC End Date: 8/10/16
IESG Telechat date: 10/28/16
Summary:
Ready.
The more important issue in my initial revi
value for the newly defined SDP attributes.
>
>
> "
>
>
> Please let me know your thoughts. I can produce a new version along wth
> IESG Evaluation comments next week.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Suhas
>
>
> --
> *From:* Dan Romascanu
see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document:
draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 11/25/16
IETF LC End Date: 11/27/16
IESG Telechat date: (if known) 12/2/16
Summary: Ready.
This is a very useful supporting document
Hi Ran,
Thanks for addressing all my concerns and congratulations to you and your
colleagues for the good work.
Regards,
Dan
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks for your review. Please see inline
>
> From: Dan Romascanu
>
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
Summary: Ready, with nits
I am not an expert in this field, but the document seems to meet its
goals, it's clear and precise
Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
1. Section 4: s/Section5.1.7/Sections 5.1.7/
2. Sect
n characteristics compared to RSA and ECDSA algorithms"
> >
> > I suggest either adding references to proofs of these statements or
> > alternatively just remove the sentence (since it doesn't really add
> > anything to the memo); the remaining paragraphs in the Secur
Milesovska 5, 130 00 Praha 3, Czech Republic
> mailto:ondrej.s...@nic.czhttps://nic.cz/
> --------
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Ondřej Surý"
> > To: "Magnus Nyström" , "Dan Romascanu" <
> droma...@gmail.com>
> > C
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
ellens
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks for your review. Please see in-line.
>
>
> At 3:13 AM -0800 1/5/17, Dan Romascanu wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review result: Almost Ready
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Ar
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Hi,
Please see in-line.
Regards,
Dan
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:00 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> please see replies, [ACM], below.
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
rence.
>
> Yours,
> Daniel
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 6:47 AM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
> t...@ietf.org; droma...@gmail.com
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
uivalent functionality in TLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-tls13].
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>
>> Dan, thank you for your reviews of this document and thanks to the
>> authors for providing clarifications. I have balloted No Objection.
>
t consider PSK
>authentication. [RFC5487] describes the use of AES-GCM in
>combination with PSK authentication, but does not consider ECDHE.
>[RFC5489] describes the use of PSK in combination with ECDHE but does
>not consider AES-GCM or AES-CCM.
>
>
>>
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
r to your feedback. The parts without
> answers mean they have been addressed.
>
> Again, thank you for spending the time to read this in this fine detail.
>
> Lucien
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Dan Romascanu wrote:
>
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>&
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Just a short clarification on one point (or two).
See in text.
Regards,
Dan
> 3. On the other hand I am missing the relationship with other work items in
> the
>> BIER charter - there is no manageability section for example, there is no
>> reference to the performance impact in networks. May
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
ologies for the
> delay in Ack-ing and responding.
>
> Please see inline.
>
> —
> Carlos Pignataro, car...@cisco.com
>
> “Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself
> sound more photosynthesis."
>
> > On Aug 22, 2017, at 11:34 A
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
ote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Dan Romascanu
> wrote:
>
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review result: Ready
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF docu
ing further in my
> ballot position.
>
> Mirja
>
>
>
>
> On 22.08.2017 17:34, Dan Romascanu wrote:
>
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review result: Almost Ready
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Te
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
F on behalf of Dan Romascanu"
> wrote:
>
> >Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> >Review result: Ready with Issues
> >
> >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> >Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> >by t
ack? Is this with
> respect to logging the occurrence of malformed TLVs or Sub-TLVs? If so,
> that can be added.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> From: Dan Romascanu
> Date: Saturday, October 7, 2017 at 1:57 AM
> To: Acee Lindem
> Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" , "d
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Hi Pete,
Thanks for your answers and for addressing my concerns.
Here are a few answers to your returned questions:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Pete Resnick
wrote:
>
>
> - 'where the IETF guest room
>> allocations are negotiated' - do we mean to say 'where IETF guest room
>> rates
>> ar
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>
> > On Jan 29, 2018, at 1:12 PM, Pete Resnick
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> 8. Section 4:
> >>
> >> 'It is anticipated that
> >> those roles will evolve. The IASA is responsible for keeping the
> >> community informed in this regard, and MAY d
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
ve delivery "ensures" a behavior is
> incorrect and will fix that.) As such, saying that implementations MUST set
> a flag that only SHOULD be obeyed seems to be of questionable use,
> especially given that the specification clearly describes what to do if
> messages are not e
to make very sure that people don't see SWIMA as
> only being applicable in that context.)
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Charles
>
>
>
> *From:* Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 21, 2018 4:11 PM
> *To:* Schmidt, Charles M.
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Hi Jim,
Thank you for your answer and for addressing my comments.
On item #2:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Jim Schaad wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
> >
>
> ...
> >
> > 2. I
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Jim Schaad wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 26, 2018 1:19 PM
> *To:* Jim Schaad
> *Cc:* gen-art ; a...@ietf.org; ietf ;
> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org
>
at 8:44 AM, Dan Romascanu wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Jim Schaad
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 26, 2018 1:19 PM
>> *To:* Jim Schaad
>> *
:19:04PM +0200, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > Thank you for your answer and for addressing my comments.
> >
> > On item #2:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Jim Schaad
> wrote:
> >
> > >
&g
not anything that is making a distinction on what the criteria to
> be used by the DE in the document which is separate, but I don’t think that
> is needed. This is why they are DEs.
>
>
>
> I still don’t see what you think is missing.
>
>
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
ressing my comments.
Regards,
Dan
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:52 AM, Mike Jones
wrote:
> Replies inline…
>
>
>
> *From:* Ace *On Behalf Of * Dan Romascanu
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 27, 2018 2:23 PM
> *To:* Jim Schaad
> *Cc:* gen-art ; a...@ietf.org; ietf ;
> Ben
the edits we
> discussed. Please let me know if you have any additional comments. Thanks
> again for the feedback - it really helped the specification.
>
> Thanks,
> Charles
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
> >
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
or the delay. Procrastination and holiday came in the way.
>
> See below.
>
> > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> > Review result: Almost Ready
> >
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being p
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
cern.
>
> Brgds,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 15:29
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
> rt...@ietf.org; droma...@gmail.com
>
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
check all that
> and generate a list of specific chaanges to the table here:
> >
> >
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/idna-tables-6.3.0/#idna-tables-properties
> >
> > ...and IANA will then apply those changes.
> >
> > Barry
> >
> > On Mon
Hi Stefan,
Thank you for your answer and for addressing my concerns. I am comfortable
with your proposals. If your AD agrees, I would include these in a revised
version before submission to the approval of the IESG.
Regards,
Dan
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:11 PM stefan vallin wrote:
> Hi Dan!
Thanks for the quick reply.
See in-line.
regards,
Dan
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:29 PM David Schinazi
wrote:
> Hello Dan, and thanks for your review. Comments inline.
>
> 1. In section 2.1:
>>
>> > The default port
>>for Babel over DTLS is registered with IANA as the "babel-dtls" port
>>
Hi Jake,
Thanks for addressing these issues.
No further comments.
Regards,
Dan
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:57 PM Holland, Jake wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On 2019-11-28, 07:22, "Dan Romascanu via Datatracker"
> wrote:
> > Nits/editorial comments:
> > 1. The readi
Thanks Ragnar, for the quick answer.
See in-line.
Regards,
Dan
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:56 PM Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thank you for reviewing!
>
> On 26 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
> wrote:
> >
> > Reviewer: Dan Romasc
Ok, thanks.
Regards,
Dan
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:24 AM Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> > On 27 Feb 2020, at 21:31, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Ragnar, for the quick answer.
> >
> > See in-line.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
&
2:24 AM Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> > On 27 Feb 2020, at 21:31, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Ragnar, for the quick answer.
> >
> > See in-line.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 20
Hi Jari,
Thank you for the answer and for addressing the issues raised in my review.
Looks fine to me by now, I am waiting for version -07 to check the precise
edits.
Regards,
Dan
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 2:28 PM Jari Arkko wrote:
> Thanks for your review, Dan.
>
> Some responses below. We are
Hi Klaus,
Thanks for your quick reply and for addressing the issues raised in my
review.
See below my short comments on a couple of issues.
Regards,
Dan
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 1:27 PM Klaus Hartke
wrote:
> Dan Romascanu wrote:
> > This is a very clear and well-written document.
Looks good to me. Thanks for addressing these points.
Regards,
Dan
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 12:31 PM Klaus Hartke wrote:
> Dan Romascanu wrote:
> >> > 1. It would be useful to include some considerations whether the
> authors
> >> > consider useful / possibl
012实验室-巴黎研究所数通实验室
> DataCom’s Lab, 2012 Laboratories-Paris Research Center, Huawei
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 10:37 AM
> > To: gen-art@ietf.org
> > Cc:
elpful suggestions.
> Please find my answers and notes below tagged GIM>>.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:02 AM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <
> nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review result: Ready with Is
t;> Reading Dan's review reminded me of one other point (inline)...
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 12:22:04PM -0700, Greg Mirsky wrote:
>> > Hi Dan,
>> > thank you for your review, detailed questions, and helpful suggestions.
>> > Please find my answers and
> I have addressed your comments in the revision:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-11
>
> Please see my answers below.
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 6:22 PM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <
> nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Reviewer: Dan
3AM -0800, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
> wrote:
> > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> > Review result: Ready
> >
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> > by the IESG
Hi Sara,
Thank you for the response and for addressing the nit-comments in my
review. All seems fine to me now from my end.
Regards,
Dan
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:51 AM Sara Dickinson wrote:
>
>
> On 17 Apr 2021, at 10:43, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Revie
Hi,
Due to a system glitch I cannot enter my reviews via the tool. Until this
is fixed, here are my early comments to draft-ietf-6man-grand, which was
assigned to me.
Version Reviewed - 04
State: Ready with Editorial Comments
This is a very well written document. I appreciate the section describ
Thank you for addressing my comments.
See in-line.
Regards,
Dan
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 10:02 AM Jen Linkova wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks a lot for reviewing the document!
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 4:00 AM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
> wrote:
> > Nits/editorial
Looks good. Thanks for addressing this as well.
Regards,
Dan
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 3:06 PM Jen Linkova wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 8:16 PM Dan Romascanu wrote:
> > Yes, a paragraph in the Introduction explaining the structure of the
> document and especially the pl
Hi Duane,
Thank you for your answer and for addressing my concerns. I am fine with
the proposed resolutions.
Regards,
Dan
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 7:46 PM Wessels, Duane wrote:
> Dan, thanks for the review. Responses are inline.
>
>
>
> > On Sep 1, 2021, at 3:12 AM,
gards,
> Paul
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 7:26 PM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <
> nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review result: Ready with Issues
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
&g
Hi Hendrik,
Thank you for addressing my (minor) concerns. The changes are fine with me.
Regards,
Dan
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 6:15 PM Brockhaus, Hendrik <
hendrik.brockh...@siemens.com> wrote:
> Dan
>
> Many thanks for your review. Please find my proposal below.
>
> >
-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10
>
> Best,
> Jean
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> > Sent: Monday 14 November 2022 19:36
> > To: gen-art@ietf.org
> > Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yan
ll make a normative reference to this registration document.
>
>
>
> Thanks again for all the feedback and comments.
>
> Derek
>
>
>
> --
>
> Derek Engi
>
> dee...@cisco.com
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
> *Date: *Saturday, Marc
ft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol (no specific version)
> Deadline: 2023-11-21
> Pages: 225
> Requested by: (System)
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol/reviewrequest/18421/login/
>
> Jean Mahoney has assigned Dan
On 11/17/23 12:02 PM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> I will ask the AD and chairs if they'd be willing to extend the deadline
> given the length of the doc and the intervening IETF meeting.
>
> Thanks!
> Jean
>
>
> On 11/16/23 4:46 PM, Dan Romascanu wrot
Hi Pascal,
Thank you for your response. This makes sense to me, with one observation.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:11 PM Pascal Thubert
wrote:
>
> 2. The deployment and backwards compatibility sections are quite good, but is
> there a recommended strategy for updating existing deployments in the
Hi Paul,
Thank you for your quick response. I am fine with your answers. I am
wondering whether adding some text clarifying the two minor issues would
help.
Regards,
Dan
On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 2:52 AM Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Thanks for your review.
>
> On Aug 2, 2024, at 07:06, Dan
Hi Ketan,
See in-line.
Regards,
Dan
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 3:27 PM Ketan Talaulikar
wrote:
>
> >
> > 1. Section 6.10 includes:
> >
> > > Note to IANA (RFC editor to remove this before publication): The new
> >registry creation request below is also present in the draft-ietf-
> >pce
This is fine with me, maybe this is worth explaining in text.
Regards,
Dan
On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 5:31 PM Reshad Rahman wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks for the review. One response inline.
>
> On Friday, December 6, 2024 at 04:21:35 AM EST, Dan Romascanu via
> Datatracker wro
Hi,
Thanks for the quick response.
Please see in-line.
Regards,
Dan
On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 5:59 PM Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Dan,
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 01:21:33AM -0800, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
> wrote:
> > This is a clear, well-written document. It is almost Read
Your proposals are acceptable for me.
Regards,
Dan
On Sat, Dec 7, 2024 at 1:00 AM Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Dan,
>
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 12:23:02AM +0200, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 5:59 PM Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> > > In other words, the implementa
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
