Hi Paul,

Thank you for your answers and for addressing my concerns. The revised
version with the changes that you proposed is Ready from a Gen-ART review
point of view.

Regards,

Dan


On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:44 AM Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <
jaehoon.p...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Dan,
> I have addressed your comments in the revision:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-11
>
> Please see my answers below.
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 6:22 PM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <
> nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review result: Ready with Issues
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>> like any other last call comments.
>>
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>
>> Document: draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-09
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review Date: 2020-09-03
>> IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-08
>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>>
>> Summary:
>>
>> Ready with Issues
>>
>> This document defines a YANG data model for the capabilities of various
>> NSFs in
>> the I2NSF framework to centrally manage the capabilities of the various
>> NSFs.
>> This is a very clear and well written document, and the use cases and the
>> examples also help its readability. The document was already reviewed and
>> found
>> READY for publication by the YANG Doctors, so I did not perform a
>> detailed YANG
>> review but rather focused on the Gen-ART specific aspects. A couple of
>> issues
>> should be discussed and clarified before approval.
>>
>> Major issues:
>>
>> Minor issues:
>>
>> 1. In the introduction:
>>
>> > This YANG data model is based on the
>>    information model for I2NSF NSF capabilities
>>    [I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability].
>>
>> So, the YANG data model is based on [I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability], and the
>> YANG
>> module references [draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-03] and
>> [I-D.ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection]. However, these three
>> documents are
>> listed as Informative References. Without them the document cannot be
>> understood and implemented, so I believe that these reference should be
>> moved
>> to Normative References.
>>
>>  => I move the three drafts to the Normative References.
>
>
>> 2. In the YANG module a few condition capabilities have no REFERENCEs.
>> Where
>> can the semantics be found?
>>
>> context-capability
>> acl-number
>> application
>> target
>> user
>> group
>> geography
>>
>>  =>  I put the references for the above condition capabilities.
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>>
>> 1. Some of the acronyms are not expanded at first occurrence (VoIP, VoLTE,
>> DDoS, etc. )
>>
>  => I mentioned the full words for the acronyms above and IPS.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
> Paul
> --
> ===========================
> Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor
> Department of Computer Science and Engineering
> Sungkyunkwan University
> Office: +82-31-299-4957
> Email: jaehoon.p...@gmail.com, paulje...@skku.edu
> Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php
> <http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php>
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to