Hi Elwyn,
thank you for your review — that is a lot of good input.
Before I start thinking about fixes for the WG to consider, let me comment on a
few items:
> Summary:Not ready for publication. There a number of issues that need
> to be addressed as discussed below. In particular whether th
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review result: Not Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more inform
Hi, Stewart,
On 4/24/2017 10:12 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> Minor issues:
>
> A node MUST NOT reduce its estimate of the Path MTU below the IPv6
> minimum link MTU.
>
> SB> I missed this last time.
> SB>
> SB> Presumably you mean "A node MUST NOT reduce its estimate of the
> SB> Path MTU below
On 4/25/17 8:20 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 4/22/17 3:23 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your doc
Dale:
Thank you for the second review. I'll address these issues along with
others later today.
Sue Hares
-Original Message-
From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dale Worley
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 10:05 PM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: i2...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.
Hi Paul,
On 4/22/17 3:23 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document
> shepherd or AD before posting a
